cottsak
cottsak on Hacker News
I'd like to understand this quip better as well
Could be a saving grace in the age where the robots come up with all the copy.
I wonder if we humans are already checking out from PR reviews from human effort that we've misjudged as AI. we are in so much trouble! lol
The US can't regulate it's own economy so the EU has to do it for them
i think you can coach agents to build simple solutions in a simple way. I'm using amp rn so check back in 6 mo with me
1) not by keeping things simple I think. (sarcasm yes, but also mostly true)
that second line is so underrated
> I don’t use this computer for serious work.
Next.
lol! It's an Operating System! It allows you to install your own apps to do things like snap windows.
If you want the OS with all the shit you do (and don't) need, then maybe Windows is for you. ;-)
and the folks who choose not to waste time can build valuable things and make market share from the others.
I find "bypassing end-to-end encryption" to be misleading... as if somehow the e2e encryption in Signal is somehow broken or flawed.
This "social engineering" hack? is simply allowing a 3rd party to gain access to another persons account and "snoop" on their secured messages/calls.
Pls correct me if I'm reading this wrong.
It's hard.
Not impossible but much harder than working closely with humble and experienced engineers. That's why I recommend that a junior engineer finds a great consulting company as soon as they can and spend a few years there. This was a kinda breakthrough period in my career for both technical and soft skills. The nature of consulting also means that you might see a greater variety of environments, technologies, and problem/solution combinations than the equivalent xp in a non-consulting role. But make no mistake, finding a "good" consulting company is key. You need to have humble and experienced engineers who want to help you and grow you. If it's a "bums in seats" kinda "body shop" or some kind of celebrity house for "hero" or "10x devs" then maybe this won't be as useful.
you just need to know the SoH (state of health). If that's 90% then you've lost 10% of the range at new. The lower the SoH for the same vehicle make, model, year and driven kms, then the worse the car has been treated. Simple as that.
I don't understand where this thinking comes from. It's not based in fact. These Tesla batteries degrade very slowly. And so if in 5 years you've lost 15% of the range, it still gets you anywhere you need to go including road trips with all of the Superchargers!? "totals the vehicle" is just nonsense and I wish more people understood the reality.
Came here with the hope of better understanding how a "reasonable person" is defined and interpreted in legal terms. It's always bothered me that legislation reaches for this "reasonable person" in some enlightened attempt to assume that there is a coherent and uniform definition and interpretation for this.
This post didn't help me.
I think the standard "it depends" applies here too... as always.
gotcha! Thanks for clearing this up