contumace
Re:Rick Falkvinge: Why free speech is harmed by the ban on child porn
on Monday September 10, 2012 @04:00PM (#4501894)
True. You just have to imagine yourself in that situation to see how unbearable it is. Even censor doesn't stop people from getting their hands on the material.
http://www.komonews.com/news/42848327.html
Quote : That leaves Kylie feeling ice cold every time she thinks about the "sick" people who take pleasure out of watching her "body being ravaged and raped." "Those images are out there forever," Kylie, now 19, said at her father's sentencing. "We can never erase what Ken has done."
Re:Rick Falkvinge: Why free speech is harmed by the ban on child porn
on Monday September 10, 2012 @10:14AM (#4499838)
Laws can't stop that from happening.
Re:Rick Falkvinge: Why free speech is harmed by the ban on child porn
on Monday September 10, 2012 @04:42AM (#4498872)
We wouldn't know what "virtual child porn" could/would be based on (real children depicted in virtual fantasies, pictures of real child abuse etc.).
I know virtual child porn is often a reference to unrealistically drawn lolicon material. But what causes much more controversy is realistic material (3D, photorealistic).
Re:Rick Falkvinge: Why free speech is harmed by the ban on child porn
on Monday September 10, 2012 @04:17AM (#4498817)
A 17 year old in a bikini isn't pornographic. I don't think anyone got arrested for that.
Re:Ask: My girlfriend is much smarter than I, how do I manage?
on Monday September 10, 2012 @04:16AM (#4498812)
You would certainly prefer to be the smartest. Do you feel threatened ?
Re:Rick Falkvinge: Why free speech is harmed by the ban on child porn
on Sunday September 09, 2012 @05:18PM (#4497037)
Maybe because there are people who buy child porn and encourage its production (law of supply and demand).
just my 2 cents