News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

conicsl

Re:xAI has acquired X, xAI now valued at $80B on Saturday March 29, 2025 @03:09AM (#43513454)
More often than you might think: https://www.shewon.org
Re:The NIH is being slashed and burned, not "reformed" on Sunday March 02, 2025 @04:52PM (#43235581)
Screening for sex can be done with a cheek swab. It's much, much less invasive than the anti-doping tests that require blood to be extracted and a direct visual on the athlete passing urine. And it only needs to be done once in an athlete's career.

In most cases though it's very obvious when a male is in a women's event. For example, no-one is going to mistake this male, who competes in women's cycling, for female: https://i.ibb.co/N6ZBzh4K/F4-Svyxt-XYAAMpc-M.jpg

The best athletes often do have some sort of genetic privilege, that is true. But look at the world records of pretty much any sport and compare the most elite male athletes with the most elite female athletes: the difference is massive. Even having advantages in limb length, lung capacity, and so on doesn't overcome the physical advantage of male development.

Re:The NIH is being slashed and burned, not "reformed" on Sunday March 02, 2025 @03:46PM (#43234876)
Conservatives leapt upon this as a wedge issue in recent years, but originally the pushback against the imposition of males upon the female category in sports (and female spaces in general) came from feminist activism.

At this point it's hundreds of male athletes competing in women's and girls' sport: https://shewon.org/males

Re:The NIH is being slashed and burned, not "reformed" on Sunday March 02, 2025 @03:32PM (#43234736)
The question is perhaps better reframed in two parts:

1. Do male athletes dominate female athletes in competition? We know the answer to that is yes, in almost all sports. It's why we have a separate female category, and there is a wealth of evidence to support this - from biological studies by sports scientists to comparisons of world records.

2. Are there any interventions that male athletes can take upon their bodies to entirely eliminate the male physical advantage in sports? From the evidence we have so far, the answer is no. They can be weakened through testosterone suppression, but in general they still retain a significant advantage over female athletes.

There is also the question of whether an impaired male athlete should be considered equivalent to a female athlete for the purposes of eligibility in the female category. This is more of a philosophical question and leans heavily on whether one believes that "trans women" are women or not. Is it fair to impose this belief on others who do not share this belief - particularly female athletes who may fundamentally object to being compelled to compete against men?

Re:The NIH is being slashed and burned, not "reformed" on Sunday March 02, 2025 @12:37PM (#43232850)
Yes, with Fallon Fox as the best-known example. He's an ex-military male who started competing in women's mixed martial arts, and broke a female opponent's skull while doing so.

Others are listed here: https://www.shewon.org/males

Re:The moral case against equity language on Saturday March 04, 2023 @08:08AM (#35020509)
> Personally I don't have a strong opinion on this, especially since trans women taking over women's sports is not a problem yet anyway.

It is a problem - see https://shewon.org for an increasingly long list of actual women who have been pushed out of winning spots in their sports by men who identify as women.