News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

colingauvin

>people that decided to shift a significant weight of decision-making authority to an AI

And I hedged that. Anything short of 100% responsibility with humans is a failure. I get investigating how it occurred, but that needs be very careful to separate ought from is.

Re:Meta bans ads for Virginia Woolf play in Spain on Tuesday September 22, 2026 @04:58PM (#49807988)
1) HN guidelines explicitly forbid astroturfing allegations:

> Please don't post insinuations about astroturfing, shilling, brigading, foreign agents, and the like. It degrades discussion and is usually mistaken. If you're worried about abuse, email [email protected] and we'll look at the data.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

2) Not part of the ruling class, my life is somewhat well documented on my blog. Just an average dude at my computer.

3) https://novelteesgifts.com/cdn/shop/files/it-has-come-to-pas...

ty, fixed
While I think that it's important to do root cause analysis, we need to be very careful not to absolve blame from the people that decided to shift a significant weight of decision-making authority to an AI. An AI can be tried in a court. There has to be a responsible human for everyone one of its actions, especially when it's killing (-people-) children.

I cannot believe this has come to pass.

Re:Meta bans ads for Virginia Woolf play in Spain on Monday September 21, 2026 @11:01AM (#49788192)
We don't have to put up with this. We simply choose to. But our laws could be whatever we want them to be.
Re:Tell HN: An inside view of Montana's new biotech law on Friday September 18, 2026 @10:09AM (#49754667)
The FDA does not let you put something in humans without a significant amount of data, full stop. And even for a small trial, the cost of the GLP tox and the GMP manufacturing is in the millions.

Of course it is nowhere near as complex as phase 2. But it is not remotely trivial.

Re:PrismML Launches Bonsai 2 27B, Its Most Capable Model Yet on Thursday September 17, 2026 @05:29PM (#49746806)
>Across a 20-benchmark suite spanning reasoning, math, coding, instruction following, vision, and agentic tool use, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B achieves an aggregate score of 83.9, retaining 98.2% of Qwen3.8 27B’s performance of 85.4. The model reaches up to 143 tokens/second on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090.

https://huggingface.co/collections/prism-ml/bonsai-2

It's ~6 GB for "98.2% of Qwen3.8 27B's performance". It is significantly faster as well. Remains to be seen how well it works, I had significant issues with the previous Bonsai 27 compared to the parent Qwen model (documented here: https://humanparadox.org/local-vs-frontier-benchmarks-for-my...) but that also graded a bit worse (~95% of Qwen3.6 27B).

Re:Assistant Benchmark on Wednesday September 16, 2026 @06:41PM (#49734049)
I have been trying to build an assistant for a year+ at this point. I have still yet to come up with a model, harness, and set of instructions that get it to reliably not contact me just to regurgitate things I already know like text messages, emails, or calendar events. I want it to have those things so it can alert me to 2nd order situations.

For instance, lets say I have a meeting with Bob, but look Bob emailed me 30 minutes ago saying to bring XYZ to the meeting - that's worth notifying me. But pinging me to say "Nothing in the next 3 hours, good time to work on <overdue reminder from 3 months ago to take garbage out". Boggles my mind they can solve novel math problems but can't figure out what is worth my attention and what is not.

Re:Tell HN: An inside view of Montana's new biotech law on Wednesday September 16, 2026 @06:27PM (#49733907)
INDs and phase 1s are expensive and not trivial in any sense.
Re:Tell HN: An inside view of Montana's new biotech law on Wednesday September 16, 2026 @06:23PM (#49733881)
Very much regret not having been able to attend last night, but kids came down with the return to school virus. Big fan of this law and also putting MT more on the map for biotech.
Re:Claude Cowork and chat are now one Claude on Wednesday September 16, 2026 @03:56PM (#49732076)
If it works reliably, sure? But like, it's not something I'd pay for.
Re:Claude Cowork and chat are now one Claude on Wednesday September 16, 2026 @02:53PM (#49731338)
I'm probably about 90%ile income for my household but live in a HCoL area and have two children in daycare. I rent, don't own, and I have enough that I can buy a coffee without thinking, but will be sending my kids to public school, can't just up and go on a vacation.

I make restaurant reservations 7-8 times a year? My wife and I go on dates and you simply aren't getting a table where I live if you don't. Fyi we typically spend $120 or so on those dinners.

Re:Ask HN: What are you working on? (September 2026) on Wednesday September 16, 2026 @12:20AM (#49722048)
Because I used a semicolon? Very much not an AI...I think
Re:Ask HN: What are you working on? (September 2026) on Monday September 14, 2026 @06:00AM (#49694377)
Ok this cracked me up; thank you.
I used to laugh at those "this software may not be used in the development of nuclear weapons" lines.
But they aren't really competitive for cost in that size class.
It's not particularly good value if you are just comparing $ with no other context. Point is just that it's accessible and so now Anthropic and OpenAI need to make both a performance proposition and a value proposition.
Not to discredit your opinion here, but will just point out I am also a PhD biochemist who has worked on viruses, so hopefully our credentials cancel. :)
OpenAI just paused new subscriptions to their $200 plan. They are in a rock and a hard place. Obviously the Astras and Fables of the world are exponentially more expensive, but for...less than exponential returns. The question is whether they can leverage the marginal advantage into something that justifies the diminishing returns before the bottom catches up to them.

On the one hand you, if you bought a lot of compute a couple years ago (perceived demand, perceived shortage) you are in a good spot temporarily. But the counter to that is that everyone else is becoming more compute efficient so maybe that advantage isn't what people thought it would be. I can almost, almost run DS4.1 Flash at home. 4 sparks can do it at 200+ tokens per second. I have two Sparks, so I am not in the club. Neither is your average laptop owner or gamer either. But your average HN software engineer can probably easily swing 2 sparks.

I am for more sick of reading people complain about it than I am seeing it. The page is a table. It was fine.
I would never advocate they not be allowed to say it. But I also am sick of hearing wildly unrealistic takes.
This number gets cited a lot but it's actually the excess mortality of post-European contact, and it's not content wide, it's specific to Mexico. It also includes climate change, famine, war, relocation, etc.
Arguably yes. I would wager no one killed by an asteroid in the history of people killed by asteroids realized what was happening before they died.
Most people do not understand how easy it would be to make anthrax. Technology is not the reason it basically is never done or deployed. AI cannot meaningfully move this needle.

Let's look at it in an inverse way. Making a single drug that impacts a single protein, intelligently, from the ground up, has arguably never actually been done. Despite unbelievable financial incentive. And with AI.

Oh my God THANK YOU.

I do not have the words how tired I am of hearing tech people and economists talk about biology.

Re:I resigned from Anthropic today (Jacob Coxon) on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @09:29AM (#49626210)
yawn

Can we just think through the logistics of AI taking over the world? Like, we won't notice it using all our GPUs? Like it somehow would have enough context to take over the world? lol.

Yes but you will lose 120 FPS/VRR. So for high end TVs not really ideal.
I'm not trying to read your comment as whataboutism, but it did get me wondering: From a moral or ethical standpoint, if there is a gradient route from "very immoral to moral", but it involves first going from "very immoral" to just plain old regular immoral - do we view it as an improvement or a deficiency? Is there a route that involves going from very immoral to moral in one direct step?

For example, exploitation is bad, but child exploitation is worse. So moving from just child exploitation to adult exploitation is a positive move that still results in an abhorrent status quo. On the other hand I can't think of an example where we went from child exploitation --> no exploitation of any kind...

Older »