codyromano

Small typo: should be "farthest man-made object" instead of "furthest." Otherwise, awesome job.

Your analogy should be narrowed according to the facts of this case. Assuming that the author's guesses about the app's behavior are correct, this is a case of software checking for one specific tool — a tool that's strongly associated with piracy. A defendant in the physical world wouldn't necessarily have a reasonable expectation of privacy if there were indications that he or she was engaging in unlawful conduct. So it's unfair to say the app's behavior would be obviously illegal or that it's comparable to a secret inventory of all of someone's physical items. That said, I'm not justifying the hijacking of the author's Twitter. That's not an appropriate remedy by any standard.

Interesting concept and I like the design. My only suggestion is to consider drawing in users a little more before prompting them to give personal info via the Google sign in. Maybe this could be accomplished by connecting some kind of interactive demo of an experiment to the "Try it now" button. In any case, I was interested in the site when I clicked "Try it now;" I just wasn't quite hooked enough to give up my info at that point.

This article raises interesting points about Facebook signups, but the statistics are meaningless because fewer than 50 users were surveyed.

This article raises intriguing points about Facebook signups, but the statistics are meaningless because fewer than 50 users were surveyed.

Very funny. Pokémon exception handling is my favorite.