codery
I only know about: https://github.com/Engelberg/better-cond in clojure which is different it adds syntax enhancement + control flow convenience.
Similar better-cond can be written in clojure too:
(defn better-cond [& clauses]
(fn [& args]
(some (fn [[pred result]]
(when (apply pred args)
(if (fn? result)
(apply result args)
result)))
(partition 2 clauses))))
Richard W. Hamming, “The Art of Doing Science and Engineering”
Today, lawyers delegate many paralegal tasks like document discovery to computers and doctors routinely use machine learning models to help diagnose patients.
So why aren’t we — ostensibly the people writing software — doing more with LLM in our day-to-day?
If you take seriously the idea that LLM will fundamentally change the nature of many occupations in the coming decade, what reason do you have to believe that you’ll be immune from that because you work in software? Looking at the code you’ve been paid to write over the past few years, how much of that can you honestly say is truly novel?
We’re really not as clever as we think we are.
[1]:orgmode.org/manual/Timers.html [2]:youtube.com/shorts/JbHE819kVGQ
All the permissions are set to FALSE. They are there, if any package you install needs that permission, it will be asked to allow such.