closetnerd
Though I think there is more to LSD. It's fair to be skeptical. If the pitch is it's going to fix everything for everyone, or the likes, then it's definitely a lie.
Otherwise I'd like to know specifically whats better/improved between models themselves.
And if we need to learn how to succeed, the initial heuristic of applying the law is the only starting point. Failure was the expected initial result.
She can fail for the entirety of her term. We lose nothing from the status quo. But if she can stick to it - then after she's taken enough of the initial beatings, someone else can come and succeed with the learnings she provides.
Makes her very likable.
On the other hand, the unproductive critique in all the comments makes me think everyone forgot how hard it is try to make something better.
I really want to know what did IK profit in the current allegations? He's creating a university where students learn for free like his decades old hospitals where people get free healthcare.
He's a major threat to the very corrupt army and dynastic parties. All other parties have joined in a coalition with the army. The only opposition is Imran Khan.
Sharifs: The head of one has been in self exile in London while he made his brother prime minister. His daughter and nephews run the party. He was found to have been hiding money when the Panama papers came out.
Zardaris: Was prime minister when Osama bin Laden was found hiding in Pakistan. Known as mr 10%. His niece accused him of killing Bhuttos. He's made his son the heir to the party.
The richest folks in Pakistan are Sharifs & Zardaris.
[1] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jul/28/pakistani-cour... [2] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/dec/16/pakistan-zarda... [3] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/sep/18/pakistan-court... [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Pakistanis_by_net_wort...
They tried to assassinate him and got very close to it.
The prompts really read in a way where I wouldn't have expected the "correct" output.
> Objects should only move if they will end up on an empty tile after their move
> "An object is free to move onto a tile that another object moves onto if that other object is moving off of its tile"
Isn't sensor + tracking abilities far more advanced at shooting down planes than planes are at creating damage? And if that's the case, aren't hyper/sonic/long/range stuff better at evading defenses?
Seems like the next "war" will be LoL style to me.
To be fair - didn't really look into it past the graph, but my initial question would be how much that has to do with all the money that artificially got pumped into the economy last year.
This is really hurting American innovation edge. If we could figure out a more effective way to get that money towards entrepreneurs / start ups - we'd be way better off.
edit: wait sry - it also says 2 weeks, so now I dont know how to read what its saying
I'll nit-pick on his point of buying experiences vs things.
Though I agree that instagrammable experiences don't have much meaningful value, I do value a lot experiences where I paid not an insignificant amount of money.
I'm assuming the author meant some balance but called something out based on his impression of an audience (maybe some projection on his part). But "paid experiences" can meaningfully lead to personal growth, perspective of other countries/peoples, deepening friendships.
That being said - you should have good long term finances to even make all that viable.