claxter

> 2. RMS is not obviously asking for any understanding nor promising to be better.

You can't apologize once there is a mixture of 10% truth and 90% defamation.

The libelous press will then print that the target has apologized for 100%, and therefore has validated the libel.

That is a straw man. Stallman has been quite effective in most areas, certainly more than the interim presidents who quickly got very corporate with all the familiar BS language.

We don't need another infiltrated Linux Foundation.

Perhaps Larry David should produce a "toe incident" episode.

It's ridiculous that people continue to bring that up due to lack of real material.

I suspect there's more than one type of autism, in Stallman's case it seems that he has no filter at all and always speaks the truth (i.e. what he really thinks).

Give a neurotypical person a truth serum and you might be surprised. And you'll have more material that the 10 points of the Stallman inquisitors.