chrislynch42
Re:The ACLU Retreats from Free Expression
on Thursday June 21, 2018 @09:14AM (#17364753)
Abortion, Gun Rights and Religious Freedom are low hanging fruit. To my mind, as a nation we are becoming less tolerant rather than more tolerant across the board. One of the reasons I have largely disconnected from Social Media.
Re:The ACLU Retreats from Free Expression
on Thursday June 21, 2018 @08:21AM (#17364417)
I had already read it and didn't see anything compelling. Basically it says its hard to maintain a tolerant cohesive society with intolerant nincompoops running around.
We have intolerant groups on both sides of many issues. Are we going to censor all of them?
Re:Synergy-core: Open source core of Synergy, the keyboard and mouse s...
on Thursday June 21, 2018 @08:14AM (#17364370)
Same here. Paid for 2.0 and it was unusable between by Win 10 and Ubuntu boxes. After fighting with it for several hours I just uninstalled and wrote it off as a loss.
Re:The ACLU Retreats from Free Expression
on Thursday June 21, 2018 @08:05AM (#17364319)
Slippery slopes are real.
Re:JDK 10: General Availability
on Wednesday March 21, 2018 @02:25PM (#16640978)
I was surprised by the responses about Optionals. Will have to look into it. As an alternative I have been looking to use the following to guarantee that certain methods cannot/will not return null (below). Maybe that is the better way to go?
return Optional.ofNullable(applications).orElseThrow(NullPointerException::new);
return Optional.ofNullable(applications).orElse(new Application());
Re:JDK 10: General Availability
on Wednesday March 21, 2018 @07:35AM (#16637114)
var seems like a bad idea to me. One of the things I like about Java is (strong?) typing. Recently learning C# and was put off by 'var'. Why is it a good idea?
Re:JDK 10: General Availability
on Wednesday March 21, 2018 @07:29AM (#16637076)
This is my reasoning as well. Also I am currently returning Optionals from any method that can result in a null.
Re:Leap: An Online Community for Women
on Wednesday January 17, 2018 @09:11PM (#16174063)
I don't agree. If sexism refers to the negative issues only then what is the word for the positive issues of dividing people up by sex?
Re:Leap: An Online Community for Women
on Tuesday January 16, 2018 @03:16PM (#16161975)
No. Having separate bathrooms for men and women is sexist, by definition. What I hoped for was discussion on whether all sexism is bad.
Re:Leap: An Online Community for Women
on Tuesday January 16, 2018 @02:55PM (#16161706)
Being a rapist is illegal, while identifying as a man is not.
I would think a better analogy is that a rape support group would not allow male victims as most rapists are men.
Re:Leap: An Online Community for Women
on Tuesday January 16, 2018 @02:15PM (#16161259)
As defined by merriam-webster.com I certainly do. Why do we consider all sexism bad?