cgcrob
I own, err, three. Use one, hedge the others on going up in value one day :)
I’m on a 10500 based Lenovo thing at the moment.
My needs are not immense though.
Short summary: "I want that in my pocket"
There's a lot of noise I can see behind the scenes on investor confidence. Noise as in "everything is fucked" sort of level of noise. Thus I expect this is being said to try and stop the AAPL stock collapsing in the upcoming recession that the analysts are predicting more than a tangible expansion and recruitment goal.
I also take issue with their being 20,000 people on the market who are still able to contribute something useful. They will be culled quickly and quietly down the line in the annual corporate lay offs.
It is not the time to make grand gestures unless you're trying to gain political favour, at which point any respect I have at least is gone.
Market opening today should be interesting...
Also the one time I reported abuse which was online banking phishing they just replied that they'd informed the upstream provider and nothing happened.
The one thing you generally want for circuits is reproducibility.
What are you going to do Ofcom?
The biggest lie that is told about crypto is that writing off a few thousand years of experience with money will make problems go away.
I have seen, at least here in the UK, some people speaking about moving entirely back to hardware that is controlled by the organisation. The case is there on a cost basis already but people are reluctant to admit this. If another magical guarantee expires such as a security one, then the reason can be shifted to that and the cost justification is collateral.
Getting out of PaaS systems is going to be horrible and expensive though. We never should have gone further than IaaS.
I suspect the idea of the cloud as it stands today may die fairly quickly.
The proponents of AI systems seem to mostly misunderstand what you're paying for really. It's not writing letters.
I’ll reduce it to a part of psychology.
Musk is trying to talk over this.
Which was on a Crew Dragon that the delivery is late on.
So that's on Musk's company. Now that looks bad. They can't even rescue them because SpaceX are running late.
He is dead now. That is probably better for the world.
I actually had little to no opinion of Musk until he started meddling in politics. An asshole CEO is expected. The market should kill them if they go over the line. An asshole politician is a very very big issue. More than stocks can be harmed.
Most CEOs would have been ejected from their companies pretty damn quickly. Why not Musk?
Observations: Firstly inventing a conclusion is a big problem. I'm not even talking about a hypothesis that needs to be tested but a conclusion. A vague ambiguous hypothesis which was likely true was invented to support the conclusion and the relationship inverted. Then data was selected and fitted until there was a level of confidence where it was worth publishing it. Secondly they were using very subjective data collection methods by extremely biased people then mangling and interpolating it to make it look like there was more observation data than there was. Thirdly when you do some honest research and not publish because it looks bad saying that the entire field is compromised for the conference coming up which everyone is really looking forward to and has booked flights and hotels already.
If you want to read some of the hellish bullshit, look up critique of the Q methodology.
I think in some fields you walk into them with some kind of noble ideology, possibly driven by marketing but then you find out it's all bullshit and you're n-years into your educational investment then. Your options are to shrug and join in or write everything off and walk away.
I don't blame people for taking advantage of it but in some areas, particularly health related, there are consequences to society past financial concerns.
I contributed nothing other than a statistical framework which was discarded when it broke their predefined conclusion.
I only say that because I’ve done it. The NAS is no longer backed up to S3. (Testing the backups caused the bill)
We got where we got because this already failed.
I've worked at a company which had people who have been dead longer than America exists in their database and some of them do not have a recorded date of death. That does not mean they are not dead, just that the death was not confirmed. And no they weren't being paid.
However if you get some junior developer in with no real knowledge of what they are doing on the job, stuff like this will appear and you can use it for political collateral because no one cares enough to understand the problem and ask questions. Like yourself.