News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

cbracy

Re:Holacracy is Bullshit on Monday March 17, 2014 @02:57PM (#7417227)
I added an edit here, pointing out that GitHub wasn't actually employing holacracy. That was my (pre-breakfast) sloppiness. My main point still stands, though. And Tom Preston-Werner describes his "management" structure here in pretty great detail so we do have some insight into what was actually going on inside GitHub: http://www.oscon.com/oscon2013/public/schedule/detail/29555
Re:Silicon Valley's Problem on Monday December 31, 2012 @08:15PM (#4991537)
To extend the analogy, expanding to the wild west eventually required a revolutionary war with Great Britian. That's a war Silicon Valley is woefully unprepared for.
Re:Silicon Valley's Problem on Monday December 31, 2012 @06:55PM (#4991382)
Just because 30 million people are using it doesn't mean it "impacted" them.
Re:Silicon Valley's Problem on Monday December 31, 2012 @06:54PM (#4991379)
CrowdTilt
Re:Silicon Valley's Problem on Monday December 31, 2012 @03:27PM (#4990755)
No, I wasn't. I wanted him to win--and am so glad he did--and criticizing him on FISA would have been counterproductive at best. I don't agree with every one of the hundreds of positions he's taken, but I'm not a one-issue voter. Despite his flaws and disagreements I have with him on some issues, he's probably the best President I'll ever see in my lifetime. Helping to get him re-elected is one of the greatest things I'll ever do.
Re:Silicon Valley's Problem on Monday December 31, 2012 @02:45PM (#4990582)
Sorry. You're right. But I don't think I'm throwing up my hands. I think there are many solutions and certainly not ones that are easily laid out as a final paragraph in a post like this. I'll definitely follow up when I think I have ideas (or share other good ones when I see them) but for me this post was an important first step to clarify my thinking about what the problem is.
Re:Silicon Valley's Problem on Monday December 31, 2012 @02:40PM (#4990558)
Completely 100% agree with you, and have been mildly obsessed with Uber and other ride-sharing apps since I moved here because of their conflict with city government and the implications they have for public transportation.

One of the most jarring San Francisco experiences I had when I first got here was getting off Mission/16th BART and then walking a block to Valencia street. The difference that block makes is a good metaphor for what I'm trying to describe in this article, but I'm not creative or articulate enough to describe it in this context and have it make sense.

Re:Silicon Valley's Problem on Monday December 31, 2012 @02:27PM (#4990506)
Yeah, as you can probably tell I struggled a lot with the term "Silicon Valley." I meant to describe more the culture than the geographic place, but since I'm based in SF it all kind of got conflated. Good point, I'm going to think a bit more about how to make that distinction clearer.
Re:Silicon Valley's Problem on Monday December 31, 2012 @02:26PM (#4990498)
I'm a "she" by the way :)
Re:Silicon Valley's Problem on Monday December 31, 2012 @02:25PM (#4990494)
I think you're misunderstanding. I think it's exactly that decentralized, networked approach to problem-solving that holds the potential for technologists to fix big problems. The issue is that in SV most are not focusing on those problems. I WANT the tech community disrupting those old institutions, and I'm frustrated we're not doing more of it.
Re:Silicon Valley's Problem on Monday December 31, 2012 @02:21PM (#4990473)
It's my responsibility too. I'm working on it. Just coming off the Obama campaign and rolling into a new gig in the coming weeks. Not ready to announce it yet, but I'm proud of it and think it's part of the solution.
Re:Silicon Valley's Problem on Monday December 31, 2012 @02:20PM (#4990465)
Leave aside that I don't think the analogy to African aid is quite relevant here, I agree with you. Charity alone isn't necessarily helpful nor does it define the good a person has done. But the lack of philanthropy in SV is indicative of the attitude and culture I'm trying to describe: individualistic, not integrated into a diverse community, divorced from a sense of civic responsibility.