catphive
Re:Emacs for the rest of us: ErgoEmacs
on Sunday January 01, 2012 @09:32PM (#3414545)
Note that ergoemacs is not the same thing as CUA mode. Ergoemacs is more about ergonomic efficiency than about mimicking windows. CUA mode is a separate mode already built into emacs.
I used ergoemacs keybindings for a year or so. They are pretty slick, and definitely more ergonomically efficient than emacs default keybindings. However, many modes are designed around emacs default keybindings, and I eventually decided it was too much work tweaking every mode I used to conform to the ergoemacs setup.
If you stick to emacs core modes which are already customized, it's probably a good choice.
Re:Emacs for the rest of us: ErgoEmacs
on Sunday January 01, 2012 @09:27PM (#3414533)
The way undo works in emacs is better than standard CUA behavior for two reasons:
1. It doesn't lose history.
2. You can undo within a selection.
However, there's room for improvement. In particular, there's packages that turn undo history into a tree. http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/UndoTree