catmanjan

I've only dabbled, but I thought for a given input, with no previous context and a hotness of zero, LLMs would be deterministic - am I wrong?

I think its an intentional mockup - perhaps the intent is to make it look like it all happened within a minute, and I'm sure they picked that time to imply that its something you could do after your 9-5... marketing is all so sinister.

Your last point is very cool, this seems like a slept on technology

Ok Im having trouble reconciling this comment

> SQL query auditing is great for knowing what queries were run but it doesn't tell you what data was actually returned

With what you’re saying - sounds like cipher doesnt tell you what data was actually returned either - it will only tell you if the user could have received a decrypted version of the data right?

So the audit log contains an ID for a key which could decrypt a value - does the audit log also contain the encrypted value itself? If not, how do you go from the audit log back to the original value in 1?

So an identifier is kept for each column returned by a query?

If the value changes would you be able to get from the id you have audited back to the value that was returned at that point in time?

On auditing, is that CipherStash or the application doing the auditing? Seems like your logs would be huge if it contained values of queries

You used to be able to do this with dragon naturally speaking (don’t remember if that was it’s exact name) 10 ish years ago

SharePoint uses it extensively

Is azure Linux still alpine, or is it a full fork now?

Ability can't really be compared to knowledge... e.g. you might lose the ability to play the piano, yet retain the knowledge about how to

I think maybe that was just when YOU were playing games, because games today still ship with tons of bugs - it usually isn't until a few years later that there is stability

I mean, yes?

Maybe it's different where you live but QA pretty much disappeared a few years ago and project managers never had anything to do with the actual software

If its profitable why are they banning people from using it in systems like claw?

So why are they banning people from using it in systems like claw?

It was revealed to me in a dream

Ok? Even if they're batched? Grid energy is batched too

Are you sure? I thought tokens (or watts) were sold at such a loss that if current supply limits were reached they’d go broke

Also interested in this - the kWh figures people talk about do not match the price of the subscriptions

Is that just because people pay subscriptions and never use their tokens? Same model as ISPs

My understanding was that if everyone paid and used AI the companies would go into liquidation on energy bills etc

How else will you get iMessage?

AI companies must hate this right? Because they're selling tokens at a loss?

Did claudebot have paying customers? My understanding with these companies is that you buy the market, the product can just be forked (like Amazon did)

Infinite growth is a childish belief

Sounds more like busy work rather than something that makes money

However good growth is finite unless you also believe in immigration and debt

If someone from the Phillipines clicks waypoints for a drone in Ukraine, is it a warcrime?

My exact reaction

>food is largely a solved problem

It really isn't...