News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

capsicum80

It is weird that microsoft is never mentioned in these articles, despite their monopoly on software in public administration, education and healthcare.
Re:C2x: the next real revision of the C standard on Monday November 12, 2018 @07:49PM (#18437419)
Actually it is block, not function. It makes it very difficult to read the code if you are looking for the scope of the variables, or investigating stack usage.
Re:C2x: the next real revision of the C standard on Monday November 12, 2018 @07:47PM (#18437399)
This, and especially in the first argument of 'for'. Not back compatible, very inelegant and luckily discouraged in many projects' coding guidelines.
Re:C2x: the next real revision of the C standard on Monday November 12, 2018 @02:58PM (#18435182)
Previous attempts to doing this have introduced unnecessary ugliness to the language such as the possibility to mix declarations with code. I can only see the language getting worse by introducing new pointless features. Unnecessary bloated C already exists and it is called C++