c0njecture
Many enterprise customers additionally use standard third party crypto libraries to tokenise and/or encrypt sensitive fields before storage in any warehouse/database such as Snowflake or Redshift.
This is a similar principle to using client-side encryption for S3. The infra provider (AWS in that case) can never read the data.
You can understand it: Snowflake lawyers are naturally reluctant to have their staff be granted access to any customer's accounts.
It is however quite common to have Snowflake PS guys have limited access to customer dev environments.
However, such access, even in dev, should always be network restricted.
It's possible the attacker was able to deduce some information about certain customers, but they would not then be able to connect to those accounts to extract data as those accounts should not be accessible from the public Internet at all, and should require corporate authentication.
Snowflake has a lot of security features. But still, customers may well misconfigure their own Snowflake accounts and therefore be vulnerable.
A well configured Snowflake account:
- does not allow any access from the public Internet. Network policies set by the customer should restrict access to corporate networks only. - does not allow authentication unless with MFA or via corporate IDP / SAML - has dynamic masking / tokenisation
Snowflake seems to have most of the Fortune 500 as customers. If Snowflake itself was somehow penetrated and all controls circumvented, it would certainly be huge and you'd be reading about a lot more than Santander and Ticketmaster.
At this point it seems more like the "AWS Hack" that affected CapOne back in the day (that was CapOne's fault, not AWS!).