buffychrome

Yeah, that's his biggest problem. I was with him as he presented evidence, but then he just dives into all kinds of conclusions and wanders straight into conspiracy theory territory and loses credibility fast. I do think the gas pipeline theory as some real merit and, it appears, to have some strong circumstantial evidence to support it, but to draw conclusions from the data? Sorry, but you just can't. There isn't enough, and to try linking it multiple mental health issues? That's not how that's done.

It's clear this is a phenomenon...too much subjective evidence to rule it out. He appears to have approached this from a fairly scientific approach and appears to have gathered some quantitative evidence. Where it breaks down is in the drawing of conclusions.

The real problem with this issue appears to be in the lack of interest from others in the scientific community to properly investigate it. If his theory about gas pipelines has merit, then it seems like there would be some simple ways to investigate and test that.