bskdjx
Well I can dream.
An anarco-capitalist (an anti-rand) libertarian flavor) rejects involuntary commitment as a matter of dogma. So these institutions cannot exist, even if they are following the "law".
Furthermore it is the state who has monopoly over violence that legitimizes this behavior (the history of physiology, involuntary commitment, and state violence is rich and fascinating).
Libertarians see this as violence over an individual. Not being the initiator of the violence, the victims have a full moral right to use violent means to defend themselves, up to and including deadly force.
Right or wrong, these "free market extremists" have a more nuanced position than "the market will sort it out"
What they technically did is raise the chemical potential, mu, of the gas phase (the phase with the lowest mu wins). TL/DR, but I'm not too impressed from a theoretical POV.
The problem to replicate this is "what do you do to raise the mu of the non super-conducting phase?". That's not trivial as many things raise the mu of the super conducting phase instead, like applied magnetic fields.
I mean no one has IQ of -5.
A couple hundred thousand votes difference is a tie. It's bad weather in Texas or California turning off a quarter million voters and ending up with the same result.
I'd just gotten my first smartphone and I went and searched for a "hacking app". An app for hacker news came up instead.
Several usr names and smartphones (and two dumb phones) later, I check check this site daily.
Oh, wait... It is!
The strait is really narrow, with really strong currents and a huge change in salinity.
Not fun.