breather

I'm as keen to wax poetic about the non-economic potential of technology as the next person, but I'm not deluding myself into thinking that was why the technology was developed in the first place.

Also, a military advantage is an economic one, there's no real difference between the concepts.

Fairly well being the key phrase—it's not difficult for a determined individual to bypass.

Art? Yes, of course! I have no clue what you're referring to with tech, though. Throughout history development of tech has almost always driven by seeking economic leverage. I'm sure there are exceptions but I can't think of any.

Not sure what you're referring to with science at all.

Tech for tech's sake helps nobody. Politics is a fact of nearly every facet of life—you can accept this and play the game or accept that you're in the backseat.

The worst people in the world already know this and run our industry. There's no reason we have to accept them.

This also sort of raises a red flag for the author—short term relationships weren't really a thing in the world of Austen, just prospective long-term relationships and essentially affairs.

The most obvious answer is you need the system frameworks to link against.

Is blocking pirate sites even really possible or are they referring to the whack-a-mole game states play?

This all may be true, but he still has a track record as an expansionist, as nationalist, as islamophobic, and as ethno-nationalist. He may not have presented much of a change in Russia's behavior the way the western press has implied he might have.

I think there are perfectly valid reasons to not like cigarette smoke, I just think that constantly harping over the "health" aspect rather than the "resolving the conflict of the smoke itself" aspect is not helpful.

> This is equivalent to actively harming others in my opinion.

We unfortunately live in a society that prioritizes freedom to harm others over freedom from being harmed by others.

Exactly—there's never been a better time to actually make the name look like it sounds.

> you simply don't care for your health at all in the first place.

I don't really see an issue with this personally. Moralizing health is weird.

Can we please god stop using AI like it's a meaningful word

Ah that's where the much higher quality of life kicks in.

> batteries serve both generating and load functions.

Only until they run out of power! Capacity is still the core of their function.

> see the CA HSR project which is massively delayed and over budget

This is not a good parallel as the HSR's cost comes in large part from traversing many counties, municipalities, and private land.

> How much solar/wind/battery capacity can 34B USD buy!?

I'm guessing you'd run into space constraints pretty quickly. For one large project a nuclear reactor is incredibly compact compared to most alternatives except maybe hydro.

Well shit, what user needs an app store to begin with? It was never about need, it was about what they could convince users to put up with.

> it's better to look positions on their merits

How do you do this when any value a "merit" could have is based in this dichotomy of vendor/user?

There's little benefit to the user for many of Apple's design decisions; that seems like an odd way to predict their behavior.

This would be a lot easier to believe if they allowed you to stop apps from accessing the internet. As they don't, I simply don't buy any argument they make from a privacy or security perspective.

I mean yea, but in practice I run into frustration that the terminal doesn't have a key dedicated to commands far more than I need to do something globally.

Anyway, you can use cmd, you just need to have an actual command (non-modifier-key) to pass it—I have no use for a key that does one thing.

Parboiling is not really the same as cooking.

Derp, thank you, I forgot these existed.

What on earth could intelligence have to do with using vr goggles

The american education system is absolutely insane—paying to get fucked!

Typically it's the recording and transcript that's copyrighted.

How did they get ahold of the copyright?

I'm referring specifically to the use of ctrl as a primary key for both the shell and the ux. How did this happen?

Anyway, keybindings are certainly changeable if you're ready to dive into a hundred distinct projects each defining their own key handling. There's no truly system wide way to alter system keybindings in any meaningful sense.

What are "web apps"? Is this just a bookmark to some site?