brandon73
For example this is totally legit:
// ClassA.java
public class ClassA {
public static class ClassA_Inner_Public_Static {
}
public class ClassA_Inner_Public {
}
}
// ClassB.java
public class ClassB {
ClassA classa = new ClassA();
ClassA_Inner_Public classA_Inner_Public = new ClassA().new ClassA_Inner_Public();
ClassA_Inner_Public_Static classA_Inner_Public_Static = new ClassA_Inner_Public_Static();
}Our society, says everyone, is way too sensitive and "PC". And, yet, we continue to attack people over the slightest perception of wrong doing.
It's ridiculous and childish.
My point was that his argument was that he generally knows what he wants and doesn't want to be incessantly marketed to -- yet, because of bad wording, you made it sound like he was erroneously claiming he wants nothing.
Almost by definition, we all want something. But that does not require constant marketing.
It's comments like this that make reading comments so much suck.
You took one tiny misworded part of his entire post and highlighted it to make an issue out of it. When you knew dang well what his overall argument was and what he really meant with that tiny badly worded part.
Stop adding to comment suck.
As a thought experiment, consider that most of our nation's founders were liberal but they favored small govt. Also, there is a number of people today who believe in classical liberalism but don't identify as progressive nor conservative; they are usually called libertarian.
Libertarians would generally eschew both Eisenhower, big govt programs, AND progressivism.
I'm not strictly a naturalist, though, but it makes sense to err on that side of caution, because evolutionary biology.
I'm all for eating fresh fruit, vegetables, roots, etc, but I don't see how this article supports only a plants based diet? Really I think what it's saying is avoid mass produced food, no?
For example, the locally sourced fresh beef I buy from my local farmer?