bpmayer
Re:Fuck the Monarchy
on Sunday May 07, 2023 @05:53PM (#35855966)
And after that: Fuck the Democracy. Stay polygamous.
Re:EU Passes Law to Switch iPhone to USB-C by End of 2024
on Wednesday October 05, 2022 @04:45AM (#33092905)
Soon they will be irrelevant anyway.
Re:50 years on from The Limits to Growth, what did we learn and what’s...
on Friday September 02, 2022 @01:30AM (#32686958)
There is no limit to growth. Innovation is unlimited. Space seems to be unlimited, too.
Re:The silent majority in software
on Monday August 29, 2022 @02:37AM (#32635345)
This original silent majority was a victim of Soviet propaganda. Nothing is better in war when the enemy no longer wants to fight because he has self-doubt.
Re:1Password Legitimizing Blockchain
on Monday February 28, 2022 @12:24PM (#30502374)
Yes, blockchain money is scam (with no intrinsic value. Its value only comes from its potential for someone to voluntarily give me something useful in return).
But: modern central bank money has the same problem. The only difference: a government could force someone to exchange something useful for some paper.
Re:Germany doesn't rule out closing Telegram – interior minister
on Wednesday January 12, 2022 @08:18AM (#29905952)
Great idea!
Re:Germany doesn't rule out closing Telegram – interior minister
on Wednesday January 12, 2022 @08:13AM (#29905912)
Let's ban the good old mail service.
There are many nasty and unpleasant people who use paper.
Re:Google outage – resolved
on Monday December 14, 2020 @07:25AM (#25416570)
Just use alternatives:
* DuckDuckGo instead of Google Search
* Bitchute / LBRY / Odyssee instead of YouTube
*Nextcloud instead of Google Drive
Re:The YouTube ban is un-American, wrong, and will backfire
on Friday December 11, 2020 @04:59PM (#25391796)
Youtube is a private company and can therefore do what it wants with its property - the Youtube platform.
However, it may be a bad decision to act as a Ministry of Truth while a number of court cases are still ongoing.
Especially since the evidence presented in court proves electoral fraud - even if it is not entirely clear whether it is relevant enough to impact the outcome of the election.