bmsran
Re:Researchers generate complete human X chromosome sequence
on Wednesday July 15, 2020 @10:41PM (#23855155)
there are long regions on the Y chromosome that are very similar to the X chromosome, which would make the analysis difficult:
Re:Researchers generate complete human X chromosome sequence
on Wednesday July 15, 2020 @10:36PM (#23855125)
One minor correction - in step 2 the DNA is not amplified as this would reduce the fragment length and also lose the methylation information
Re:Researchers generate complete human X chromosome sequence
on Wednesday July 15, 2020 @10:27PM (#23855076)
The "ultra long" nanopore reads used in this study are often greater than 100kbp in length and occasionally up to 1Mbp
Re:Coronavirus clue? Most cases aboard U.S. aircraft carrier are sympt...
on Thursday April 16, 2020 @11:28PM (#22895941)
the distinction is important here because this subthread started from the suggestion that there are multiple strains circulating, with different virulence. The fact there are multiple lineages is a natural consequence of how viruses spread
Re:Coronavirus clue? Most cases aboard U.S. aircraft carrier are sympt...
on Thursday April 16, 2020 @10:54PM (#22895790)
Re:DNA seen through the eyes of a coder (2017)
on Thursday January 25, 2018 @09:40PM (#16236636)
"Is here. This not a joke. We can wonder about the license though. Maybe we should ask the walking product of this source: Craig Venter."
The reference build of the human genome (provided here by Ensembl) is almost entirely derived from the public human genome sequencing project, not the private project led by Venter.
Re:Two genes in Chromosomes 13 and 14, linked to Homosexuality
on Thursday January 11, 2018 @12:17AM (#16121546)
This is the most important statement in the paper.
Re:Geneticists pan paper that claims to predict a person's face from t...
on Saturday September 09, 2017 @09:55PM (#15210113)
It is common to compare traits in monozygotic vs dizygotic twins to help control for shared environments.
Re:Response to “Unexpected mutations after CRISPR-Cas9 editing in vivo”
on Wednesday July 05, 2017 @09:56PM (#14707647)
Also a great example of the system working as intended. A group publishes a dubious study with potentially important implications and people queue up to refute it, correcting the scientific record.