blasorast
Re:
on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @05:49PM (#42705015)
Exactly. It's fundamentally misogynistic for these men to appropriate a "woman" identity, and Mulvaney is a very typical example of this.
Think about it. If you remove the female body from the definition of woman, what else remains besides sexist stereotypes?
Re:
on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @03:51PM (#42703665)
The backlash arose for many reasons, but this article explains the most principled one:
https://thecritic.co.uk/dylan-mulvaney-did-not-share-our-gir...
It's not priggish to take a stand against misogyny, is it?
Re:
on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @03:47PM (#42703622)
https://thecritic.co.uk/dylan-mulvaney-did-not-share-our-gir...
This article explains why.