bingbangboom

Here's a modern equivalent: https://cloudhiker.net/

>We cannot tell all people below certain IQ to just stop using the internet

Not directly, but we can ban children from the internet (or at least force them into read-only mode) via some legally enforced anonymized federal ID system.

I'd accept the privacy risks associated with that in order to fix the internet.

No, you can't just occupy private property as a protest. Hence why they were arrested.

(Reposting: Why was the following comment, word-for-word, immediately flagged? I see nothing wrong with it.)

They should. It's important for everyone, even those you personally deem to be the worst of humanity, to have a voice.

Assuming they follow the rules on the site, which would probably be based on US law.

This is how my ideal social media would be ran.

How often is that being done in the modern age of social media? I don't think "activists" are very important or dangerous to governments anywhere.

Milestones 4-6 (ending up with 6 at 10^6 qubits) aren't given an ETA.

For those more familiar with the field, what are the chances we have million qubit quantum computers a decade from now? Too early to tell?

This is going to be extremely helpful for integrating LLMs into my web apps.