bigbluedots

Yes, programming language discussions can be vibes-based and therefore low value too, but sometimes the more concrete aspects of the languages at hand, e.g. language features and tradeoffs are discussed. That is something that I'm not seeing in equivalent AI discussions.. there is a lot of how a particular AI model "feels" to interact with.

These threads seem to have become exceedingly vibes-based. Yes, something may now be cheaper or more expensive or whatever, but there is no way to objectively measure quality (except for "trust me bro" benchmarks). So the discourse is people saying that for them, this or that model was better - which is a very low value data point.

Like what? Provide examples please.

Wow That Is Fantastic And I Am So Glad To Hear It, You Have Really Put In A Lot Of Effort!

Enterprise customers care about things like guardrails and data safety. xAI has always been anti guardrails, and who knows if you can trust them with your data.

No company that uses Cursor now is going to be ok with using xAI models.

Not a drop of blood to be seen anywhere!

It might be time to start interacting with agents using grug speak only

Well, you did say all. Is there a minimal set of exposed features that must be exposed for a workflow engine to be included?

Yes, because launching then immersed in something that will greatly increase the launch weight will help...

I'm hoping it's a human with a taste for satire

All hail your new overlords!

That's fine, you do you. Everyone gets to choose for themselves!

Go look it up, he doesn't

Who is "us"? You are not me.

It is nice to hear someone who is so influential just come out and say it. At my workplace, the expectation is that everyone will use AI in their daily software dev work. It's a difficult position for those of us who feel that using AI is immoral due to the large scale theft of the labor of many of our fellow developers, not to mention the many huge data centers being built and their need for electricity, pushing up prices for people who need to, ya know, heat their homes and eat

At some point you don't need "the one that gives you joy". You need the one that pays the bills and feeds the family

Is there a "draw a pelican riding a bicycle" version?

I just realized I'm running late, it's almost -2!

More seriously, I'd love to see how the models perform the same task with a larger token allowance.

Don't know, probably? I'm a linear reader

No, we don't.

whoosh

It is less safe for women than men unfortunately.

If a person doesn't exist, can they see penguins?

A war is usually something that has two sides fighting it.

They do, we call it 'the Internet'

It's amazing how many anecdotal folk remedies we're presented with on this forum, which I had assumed would have a more scientific bent.

SBF also ate the omelette

Please elaborate?

> They did this by using one access token and three service account credentials that had been taken, and that we failed to rotate, after the Okta compromise of October 2023

It's fair to "punch down" imo as that's how the credentials were originally compromised. I'd agree with you if CF were trying to minimize their own mistake but that doesn't seem to be what is happening here