beu5a
Re:An executable specification language based on temporal logic of act...
on Sunday October 18, 2026 @03:33PM (#50144509)
I have been using Quint for some time now, both for verification of my designs via simulation and model checking and as a formalization layer for my AI agents to help eliminate any ambiguity from my requirements. I really helps to have an intermediate layer between natural language specs and code. I have been struggling to make LLMs produce code that fulfills all my requirements and even skills like wayfinder and grill-me (they are very helpful still) lack the structure that executable specifications provide in materializing requirements into a clear design.
Re:What TLA+ can and can't check
on Wednesday September 30, 2026 @06:07PM (#49915118)
You should look into Quint: https://github.com/quint-co/quint. It comes with simple syntax and very good developer tooling. Quint to TLA+ is what Typst is to Latex.
Re:Intro to TLA+ for the LLM Era: Prompt Your Way to Victory
on Thursday May 21, 2026 @07:56AM (#48221184)
You can try Quint for specifications. It has an easier syntax closer to functional programming language and doesn't require a big investment learning the syntax: https://github.com/informalsystems/quint