bertit
Re:Qt binding for Go with support for all major operating systems
on Friday November 11, 2016 @03:33AM (#12928957)
I enjoy working with QML. There are a few issues, but it is not "crap" at all.
Re:A bug story: data alignment on x86
on Monday November 07, 2016 @05:53PM (#12895992)
That would not work. Since the test may not cause any problems. While the compiler might find more optimzation opportuinities in the real program. (Just as the begining of the function did not have problem, but the for loop had.)
Just don't use undefined behavior.
Re:A bug story: data alignment on x86
on Monday November 07, 2016 @05:48PM (#12895958)
Well, it is blaming someone who does not know how to use its tools.
If I had writen a blog post aboug how I spent one day trying to fix a leak and then discovered that I always had to call free() after malloc(); would it still be victim blaming than blame me for not knowing the basic of C?
> The alignment bug here is such an example.
It is not since it allows vectorisation. The error was to assume that what one writes in C translates directly to assembly.
Re:Qt 5.7 released
on Thursday June 16, 2016 @09:25AM (#11915877)
AFAIK, the reason Apple avoid (L)GPL3 is because of the patents clauses. Not because of the Tivoization