bearfox

What happens after the next year then? Or if only top 10-5% performers stay (and that's in combo with AI).

This fits my bias so well, I'm skeptical but can't refute. So well that in fact the title reminds me of an SF story I always come back to when thinking about effect of AI on the society. The Plateau by Christopher Anvil.

It rings true. Then we have a question in front of use - when you're doing the changes yourself you are also building and adapting the mental model of the system - which approach needs less effort in total?

I'm in the enjoy writing code camp and do see merits of the hybrid approach, but I also worry about the (mental) costs.

I feel that for using AI effectively I need to be fully engaged with both the problem itself and an additional problem of communicating with the LLM - which is more taxing than pre-LLM coding. And if I'm not fully engaged those outcomes usually aren't that great and bring frustration.

In isolation, the shift might be acceptable, but in reality I'm still left with a lot of ineffective meetings - only now without coding sessions to clear my brain.