bconsta

Kind of ironic considering Anthropic hasn't even been around for 7 years.

Too similar to Goldfinger cheating at cards and golf to not make me chuckle.

Seems ironic that Claude isn't listed as a contributor to this article.

If was used in writing the article, why not list it? If it wasn't used, that seems to go against Anthropic's whole message.

Obviously readers value human-written content more, but isn't it their interest to attempt to destigmatize llm output as much as possible?

David Graeber in three lines

I had no idea about this. Thanks for sharing

There is a study that gives a rule of thumb of ~2 bits per param for a model's memorization capacity: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.05405

Pixel 9a is probably the closest to what you're describing on the market today.

If I'm not mistaken, the idea is use MCP to let a user-facing LLM make tool calls to a VLA model with actions the user prescribes. He mentions using the LeRobot library in another comment.

pareto adequate

Following along these lines, I asked chatgpt to come up with a term for 'haboginking a habogink'. It understood this concept of a 'gorbink' and even 'haboginking a gorbink', but failed to articulate what 'gorbinking a gorbink' could mean. It kept sticking with the concept of 'haboginking a gorbink', even when corrected.