News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

badwolf93

if science is wrong then science moves is not that the goal of science?
Re:I Dreamed of a Perfect Database on Saturday December 05, 2015 @12:22PM (#10682536)
I woke up and find riak, hope they make search on by default but one could argue that perfection is not a thing.
Re:PHP 7.0.0 released on Thursday December 03, 2015 @04:54PM (#10672971)
and nobody cares
Re:Terra: A low-level counterpart to Lua on Tuesday December 01, 2015 @09:42PM (#10660556)
there's nothing wrong with Lua
Re:Efene: an Erlang VM language that embraces the Zen of Python on Saturday November 28, 2015 @10:18AM (#10641245)
Thank you Brian! and the roman empire then for Bristmas, the terribly braindead idiotic system yada, yada... argument it's that I can't really see fair throw any useful kind of lens.

So it really surprises me and stuff.

Re:Efene: an Erlang VM language that embraces the Zen of Python on Saturday November 28, 2015 @10:09AM (#10641220)
Can you please elaborate more on "this feels really weird in Python"?
That's probably a mater of perspective, you and a lot of people seems to be building a REST API splitting functionality into independent services, and is great and a good thing, but it means the architecture needs to have complexity and failures in the right mind/context.

It's not right to bring just twisted to the discussion, I can give you tornado as completely the opposite, it's beautiful and simple and plays great with the multi-process libraries and asyncio, Python 3, etc.

The concurrency models are just different and it's probably nothing wrong with that, single threaded processing using coroutines inside and talking with other processes by message passing using zmq and not rabbit could be monitored with supervisor another great python tool... they are just different tools for different jobs that in fact work in team better that for each own, Python + Erlang.

My point is that is like comparing a mango with a sunfruit, and again there's nothing wrong with the erlang syntax.

Btw I know rabbit it's build on Erlang but again I think it's not a good Erlang example, you could used cowboy as a better OTP builded Erlang application, and again just a mater of perspective.

I'm not a erlang expert but the use of the case statement is not considered a bad practice? or was the if clause instead? and it seems to me that all is kind of glued inside some sort of a try/catch defensive programming style that the really zen of erlang is completely against.

Personally I don't see the need of use every tool in the same way, there is nothing wrong with the erlang syntax.

you are so wrong that's not funny
Re:Ask HN: Do you listen music while programming?? on Saturday October 24, 2015 @06:32PM (#10445125)
65daysofstatic, moondog, explosions in the sky, god is an astronaut, instrumental stuff.
Re:Ask HN: How do you approach a new framework/language? on Saturday October 24, 2015 @12:04AM (#10442388)
How do you approach the documentation, you read it.