aswegs8
aswegs8 on Hacker News
Not sufficient to run SOTA LLMs
There is nothing that could prevent a bad actor from replicating exactly the same thing with the given goal of e.g. gaining control of critical infrastructure or extorting money. Except for maybe economics.
Yeah but why shouldn't this be possible? We learned that we can already create artifical intelligence that surpasses human intelligence in some dimensions. There is no natural barrier here. The pace of this improvement would be debatable, but what speaks against the possibility of such accelerating self-improvement?
Now you piqued my interest. Any good AI-written books out there? I thought it's all slop.
I am pretty sure if you play at pro level you train this out of yourself. But then, the marathon / running examples where certain milestones get broken by one person and then suddenly by a host of others, is a counterargument.
for sure, they internally are maximally AI-pilled (or AI psychosis, whatever you prefer)
Again, that is the point. There is rumours that this one thing would be solvable, so they focus on this, spending 15m on one specific thing, instead of 105m on many. How is that fishy?
Reminds me of amateur table tennis. There is a strange dynamic where you down regulate your performance unconsciously when the opponent is playing worse and vice versa.
Could be described as some physical form of this effect: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asch_conformity_experiments
The term would be conformity / normative social influence.
Yeah but that is the whole point, right? Maybe I am thinking too simply, but it seems obvious to me. LLMs are intelligence without consciousness. Once we build in a self-referential learning loop into the models, it will gain a form of what we consider consciousness.
Wow!!! That's awesome. So much AI slop. That here is definitely not. Kept me hooked, even though I am not a crime nut. Much improvements possible for sure, but I can see how this becomes a serious game with a lot of players.
How could something like open source ever be perceived as bad?
If you know anything about investing, you know it is highly likely to be either A a grift or B an innocent, but naive attempt.
Wait I thought the testing and release pipelines at Google are super fast?
I mean, yeah, fun project. But that whole game could be like 15 mins of prompting.
Some kind of romance scam. Look it up.
It's just restricted for me, even with X account I can't view it.
Eugenics is not scientifically unsound. It's just completely outside of today's Overton window.
Nobel laureates are just normal humans and sometimes believe in garbage ideas. Surprise.
What's the argument here? It's not about the implementation method, it is about the behavior that emerges from it. You could calculate the next token by hand on paper if you had enough time.
Not at all. Economically, yes. Socially they are far left of the European left.
I think the question is less about where it's most beneficial but which knowledge structure lends itself to LLMs most. Since biology's "language" is way more complex and irregular than maths or natural language, it isn't particularly accessible.
I think the author is having a kind of idealistic, relaxed view of work. Moving quickly, even if you break things, has a clear advantage over being perfectionistic, waiting to get feedback, building things that are not needed.
These are obvious lessons of agile management. Even if they are not absolute, maybe that post is meant as some kind of relative statement, in general, speed is a good thing. More speed than you are comfortable with.
Wait isnt that what Elizer Yudkowski keeps going on about?
Posted by
aswegs8 on Tuesday July 28, 2026 @09:41AM
from the wsj.com dept.
I think a few years ago we were, but not anymore. I hope, at least, that European politicians have learned.
Most beautiful pelican so far.