arein2
I showed a demo how easy it is to read private ssh keys to the head of infrastructure, and after some months people could connect to network only using custom credentials (ldap) which was good, but also asked us to install "spyware" that among other things checked the firewall. I never installed the "spyware" but nobody pushed me. I didn't think I somehow prevented a disaster or did some heroic deed because everyone in the company was professional and nobody would exploit this. But of course I didn't tell about this to anyone except the infra because such information should not be disclosed until is fixed. And once is fixed why disclose it?
I really miss the Mac checkbox to enable the firewall. On linux I use nftables which is really powerful, but with so many possibilities it is easy to miss something during configuration.
I observed a lot of senior engineers don't have sufficient network knowledge. A lot of people on linux don't use the firewall which is really bad if you work on shared wifi.
Also when running docker images, if you map a port when using docker run (ex. docker run -p 80:80), docker will automatically add firewall rules and bypass the enabled firewall, exposing that port publicly.
Of course there are other companies that have similar approach, but if you want to make a change, I am guessing Apple would be the best company to try to force into more nature and consumer friendly practices.
It was working until Elon bought twitter.
The target audience for nand2tetris are people that want to understand how the CPU works, and nand2tetris focuses too much on how to make logic using nand gates leaving other areas uncovered.
I recommend the Ben Eater youtube chamnel, he has a series of videos about building an 8bit computer, that in my opinion is much more informative for a curious person.
a very slimy and backwards model
https://i.imgur.com/p1AFgjL.png not sure if this is real, but might be.
The same sick people are giving orphan kids for adoption to pedophile parents in Germany https://www.dw.com/en/berlin-authorities-placed-children-wit...
All this stuff is used to confuse people into submission to nonsense, and after some years when the trans narrative is worn out something new will have to appear, and looks like pedophilia is a good candidate.
I also think we will have implanted cips in the future. Everybody ridicules people that say that Bill Gates wants to cip people because it's too ridiculous. But I think we are not too far away from that (maybe 20 years). Social Credit Score is doing well in China, and there is https://id2020.org/ by Microsoft and Gavi The Vaccine Alliance. When I read the website I can't not laugh. They present the idea in a nice way but if you look trough it is actually just enabling government to have maximum control over you. Also there is this phrase: But doing digital ID right means protecting civil liberties and putting control over personal data back where it belongs...in the hands of the individual.
For the "non-exact" ones there is always possibility of corruption. I think the current establishment for some areas in science is politicised, and there is a system in place - you have to be published in certain prestigious publications to receive money, but if you do not follow the political status quo, everybody will cut ties with you.
I guess more transparency about data collected and videos of experiments would help, but I don't think that's a solution. This is a problem only few worry about, the system is perfectly happy the way it is.
This whole incentive - corruption relation reminds me about greek democracy: You want to chose the leader that doesn't want to be chosen, so that he would not have incentives. The athenians also chose people at random instead of elections, to minimize the chance of picking someone with special interests.
Putting kids on hormones is wrong.
I am thinking about the next nareative, and I am pretty sure it's going to be pedophilia.
Maybe because your comment is not the assuring "vaccines don't cause autism" and people already chose the assuring narative.
Vaccines do cause a lot of bad stuff, however for mass population it makes sense to vaccinate, as the benefits outweight the drawbacks.
If any science is related to politics or there is some business/financial incentive I just assume it's skewed.
Take for example the harvard study that is responsible for the US obesity. The study found that sugar does not make you fat, because of food conpanies.
Or the guy that discovered the ulcer cause and cure. It was ignored because the fake ulcer treatment industry was a multi billion dollar one.
The "I F***g LOVE science" guys that will beleive anything, because SCIENCE are the worst
>With potential damages multiplied across millions of users, cloud-computing and user-generated content sites like YouTube, Facebook, or GitHub probably never would have existed without the DMCA (or at least not without passing some of that cost downstream to their users).
Talk about backwards logic
To do that use Handbrake, whick is open source and the go-to app for any encoding.
You find a website that creates a link between 2 clients, and the file is shared via https (maybe the file is decrypted at the server and encrypted again using your public key). Sounds easy if both clients don’t have a public IP (to get SCP to work, at least one client needs a public IP) and every browser now has WebRTC.
Instead it proceeds to list the best software in class used by the developers. It just sounds stupid to me.
Regarding Docker, I have this opinion because Docker was the trend for a few years, at every conference there was a hipster making a presentation about docker. So I think Docker made containers the cool topic and a lot of people started using containers because of that. And because a lot of people used it, new services/software started appearing around it.
Yes, Docker uses the existing kernel apis for containerization, but the value it added was publicity, ease of use and adoption for containers, not the core features
I mean a lot of things are obvious, why pretend they are not
Everyone was trying to make a system simple and adopted, but if you want it to be adopted, it's going to need a lot of features. Also Google worked some real magic in getting Kubernetes being supported by all the cloud providers.
It's a framework that will enable you to do what you want, while being the standard.
You could write your script to do that in a simpler way, but most people already know the standard and it's easier for everybody to understand Kubernetes rather than your clever solution.