News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

arcavorago

Re:Interview with AMD CEO Lisa Su on Thursday March 02, 2017 @11:29AM (#13775352)
Care to actually back up that statement with any sort of citation or fact? According to the leaked 3dmark benchmarks, the top 3 Ryzens are on par with some of the top i7 quads... so honestly I'm not sure where you are getting this idea from. It also completely ignores the price disparity which makes the AMD slightly slower but much cheaper CPU's a doable upgrade for many. (And VR capable)

http://cdn.wccftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/AMD-Ryzen...

http://cdn.wccftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/AMD-Ryzen...

http://cdn.wccftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/AMD-Ryzen...

Re:Introducing Private Networking on Wednesday September 11, 2013 @03:53PM (#6369574)
I'm talking about AI style responses based off a dataset I provide. Not just presence. =)
Re:The ﹤main﹥ element on Wednesday September 11, 2013 @01:31PM (#6368573)
I was just trying to show an attempt at no divs/spans in html, and even said it was ugly and a work in progress, so thanks for your kind assessment. That being said,

1) And what is particularly wrong with that? I said that the design was so that the html5 semantic elements would fit well into the body section, removed from the nav/footer. You might as well just say, "oh, that's just some text dumped into a div,section,etc hoho...".

2) Actually there is no standard regarding this. Maybe a best practice, but not a standard. http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/sections.html#t...

So it sounds like you want someone to show a certain kind of design done semantically. If that's the case, then you should have said specifically what you were looking for in the first place. eg. 3 columns each with 4 rows without divs/spans, etc. In this case this could still be put into my page, just put classes or id's onto the articles or other elements and manage with css.

It should be noted this is a strange request as well, div's used in the correct way are perfectly valid with html5/css3, so you are unlikely to find anything much more than what I have just shown you...(and again, if that was your original point, you should of just said it in the first place.)

Re:The ﹤main﹥ element on Wednesday September 11, 2013 @12:48PM (#6368280)
Still under heavy construction and playing with the layout, so forgive the ugliness of the css at the moment, but here is my personal website which I am attempting to do with good semantics and html5/css3 only, (no js).

http://www.warriors-shade.net

The actual article area will (should) accommodate the semantic tags well (main, article, aside, figure, etc).

Re:Introducing Private Networking on Tuesday September 10, 2013 @04:51PM (#6363398)
Essentially, yes. Sometimes as a proxy and sometimes straight from shell (irssi). My long term goal is to tailor an IRC bot to represent me virtually while I am unavailable (at work, etc).
Re:Introducing Private Networking on Tuesday September 10, 2013 @10:54AM (#6360367)
Just signed up for DO mostly just as a layer of separation for when I am on IRC. Very impressed with them and thinking about many other possibilities now. Keep it up DO!
Re:NSA Spying Documents to be Released As Result of EFF Lawsuit on Thursday September 05, 2013 @04:38PM (#6336770)
My favorite is when Sibel Edmonds approached them with a source that was saying the judges themselves are dirty and compromised (largely via the prism-esque programs) and the ACLU told her to basically not rock the boat and leave the judges alone...