News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

aparticulate

Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Sunday March 02, 2025 @05:15PM (#43235802)
kind of a schizopost?
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Sunday March 02, 2025 @05:08PM (#43235729)
Quite a conspiracy theory you have there. Wake up sheeple!
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Sunday March 02, 2025 @05:08PM (#43235722)
Fascist prez didn't really ring well with USA voters during Kamala loss so I expect "you" people to just kind of burn out on the whole strategy. Simply the most likely scenario. The majority of the US voted for a fascist? Just reeks of midwit thinking to most people.
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Sunday March 02, 2025 @05:01PM (#43235663)
Biden 2020 was supposed to be civility prez, I don't think anybody thinks Trump is civil? Zelenskyy personality cult did need a dressing down but I also think it was a piece of a performance art, in all likelihood.
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Sunday March 02, 2025 @04:53PM (#43235594)
Good of you to get the correct talking points back on track! Curious how well this strategy will work? Is there a single Pro Russian perspectives allowed in a critique of a war we pay for? Almost seems like a problematic monoculture. Alas this is primarily a tech site but I would expect SOME debate.
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Saturday March 01, 2025 @03:31AM (#43217275)
“whataboutism” is a weak and recent phrase that means literally nothing. Please engage with specifics.

Most Americans would not agree with a 1939 “ascendant dictator in America” narrative and yet you do. I wonder how the “you people” strategy works in your brain? I do not think of HN audience as separate to “my” people. Silly that you do the inverse.

Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Saturday March 01, 2025 @03:22AM (#43217226)
Two avoidable new wars under Biden. Insane departure from Afhaganistan. Was Trump in any way worse in foreign policy? I thought we returned to civil adults in the room again! I no longer have any patience for any non populist Democrats. Not serious political thinkers in any way.

We all saw when the DNC champagne socialists turned their their nose at Palestinian activists, this is not a serious Left wing movement by any intl standard. It’s overflow parking for elitethink. What good recent policy is even proposed? There’s nothing. Look elsewhere for inspiration because the USA Left is bankrupt intellectually

Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Saturday March 01, 2025 @03:15AM (#43217184)
You don’t think there has been mad kings in the last 80 years? You think the Iraq/Afghanistan dalliances were not inherently domination oriented? JFK was killed for specific reasons that you can look up if you at all curious.
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Saturday March 01, 2025 @01:48AM (#43216637)
Come together as what? What does this Beatles-era sentiment entail specifically?
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Saturday March 01, 2025 @01:07AM (#43216445)
Pure cope, how well did the sanctions strategy work? I hear US companies are returning soon
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Saturday March 01, 2025 @12:00AM (#43216108)
The other powerful “dictators” get dragged through the streets or hanged for daring to enjoy an economic system outside the US dollar. Putin knows this and so should you.
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Friday February 28, 2025 @11:57PM (#43216087)
I thought Russia did a unique “full scale” unprovoked invasion? You can’t have it both ways and pearl clutch about sovereignty.

World affairs is only ever literally just gentlemens’ agreements and always has been.

Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Friday February 28, 2025 @11:53PM (#43216060)
Illegal Schmillegal, what legal avenue would you suggest Russia pursue? NATO expands eastward for decades, it’s a major defense alliance literally designed against Russia.

I don’t know what you expect? “Rules based” international order that US created for its own incentives might not be a fruitful venue of discussion.

Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Friday February 28, 2025 @07:13PM (#43213814)
[flagged]
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Friday February 28, 2025 @06:48PM (#43213468)
So NATO is literally trying to kill Putin, what formal legal avenue would you like Russia to take?

Decades of NATO enlargement. What do you expect? Poke bear enough and it will bite you! But don’t be shocked…

Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Friday February 28, 2025 @06:35PM (#43213324)
[flagged]
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Friday February 28, 2025 @06:28PM (#43213221)
Musk is not a world leader.
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Friday February 28, 2025 @06:25PM (#43213188)
Life in Russia is not like North Korea/Islamist country because it's literally not. Kind of retarded hypothetical.
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Friday February 28, 2025 @06:17PM (#43213109)
It's as a prop to make him look hard af. Is he IN combat regularly? No.
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Friday February 28, 2025 @06:14PM (#43213068)
I am trying to express in good faith, I have found the Left to be generally less effective in dealing with grassroots criticism (it's seen as too populist). Trump will flip on an issue due to pressure from the frog guys. The Left are more dogmatic from top intellectuals, don't really listen to the base. Huge issue in the last elxn. Fixable though imo.
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Friday February 28, 2025 @06:04PM (#43212948)
Literally the same country
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Friday February 28, 2025 @06:02PM (#43212922)
legitimate is in the eye of the beholder is right!
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Friday February 28, 2025 @06:01PM (#43212915)
Primary sources.
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Friday February 28, 2025 @06:01PM (#43212908)
Look into contemporary funding and actions by USAID, National Endowment for Democracy, many NGOs and media organisations. It's pretty blatant and now starting to be documented by our own media:

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/25/world/europe/cia-ukraine-...

Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Friday February 28, 2025 @05:48PM (#43212758)
Do you recommend violent 2014 coups instead? That is our position on Ukraine, officially.
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Friday February 28, 2025 @05:43PM (#43212703)
To follow your line of questioning, which I do appreciate, It would be that Russia has engaged in influence campaigns in the West, of course, but that we do that the West does this as a matter of course worldwide and our schemes are much more elaborate, anyway.

I also agree about in 5, Russia is convieniently riding a wave of populist conservatism which Putin (cynically, corruption-based, or otherwise) aligned with the Orthodox alignment in Russia. (Men/Women are different, global woke policy, SDG development goals etc) Many working class people are sick to death of effete urbane progressive politics (doesn't even really benefit any core economics) I would say this is a bigger propaganda play from Russia = Give sympathetic activists ammunition for cultural victories (that were fragile and brainless Western ideas anyway.)

The problem with this granular obsession of a deep Russia conspiracy inside the US is that you aren't even really aware about what the propaganda they are saying on their side and not really cogniscent that Western foreign policies engage in pretty ugly propaganda, unlawful killings as a matter business.

Russia propaganda is simply more advanced version of the type of propaganda we were doing anyway. It's just that you don't see your own side as capable of misinformation, influence peddling worldwide and they are guilty of it.

EUROMAIDAN was a Western intelligence op — and you worry about what; a few scary Facebook ads? Is there a particular piece of misinfo on RT you are concerned about?

Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Friday February 28, 2025 @05:12PM (#43212274)
"Glory", so not specifics around hypothetical land Putin aka Hitler 2.0 imagines he wants. There's no evidence for him saying anything besides … what he's literally says. This fantasy conjecture is weakening the international position on Ukraine, especially with such easy access to Russian translation tools where we can just expose this secret conspiracy of yours. He literally only talks about Ukraine, you can look into this yourself.

Or perhaps you mean "glory" in the sense of some kind of national pride and confidence in culture and nationality? I am not sure arguments against any nation seeking a sense of themselves are particularly compelling…

Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Friday February 28, 2025 @05:06PM (#43212161)
Not sure how entertaining a petulant State Department puppet with a maxxed out credit card counts as leverage? US orchestrated Euromaidan in order to eliminate Russia from the chess board and balkanize the region. That's our negotiating position in the West.
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Friday February 28, 2025 @04:58PM (#43212024)
I think it's a fine rule of thumb but what does Putin have to gain from negotiating with Zelenskyy who he is seen as a Western puppet orchestrated as legacy of US intel agency involvement? (Which we admitted is true…)

People in this thread are completely incapable of seeing any legitimacy in any Russian concerns about Ukraine.

Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting on Friday February 28, 2025 @04:48PM (#43211831)
> The generals push for territory at great expense

…by focusing on controlling sectors in mainly the East?

Older »