anunnymouse

'this is complicated, nuanced and not literal' - arn't most things though? At least the person you are replying to started their comment with a weasel word - you're the one making the categorical statement about whether it is literal.

You say it is just harassment but also that ripping off (A)GPL source code shouldn't be excused.

What is the appropriate level of response?

Maybe i'm reading too much into this, but are you suggesting they stop trying to prevent it from happening in any channels, because it might be possible in one?

Oh, you again.

'Many' 'Allegedly'

These may be facts, but are they actually useful?

This guy uses big words like expound and orthogonal.

Yes that's right. The halting problem does not actually exist in the financial world.

This is an interesting point, what does it mean when it is gray?

Is it so binary? Maybe people are reprioritizing work relative to things like family, environment, health.

That rationale makes sense to me, after the year and half of lockdowns and torrent of abysmal climate news, regardless of whether it is the right strategy to solve the problems we have.

The author of the tweet may be talking about how to be successful in a narrowly defined context of business, and getting a lot of blowback from people suggesting there may be other ways to define success that don't require the fetishization of career growth.

Remember that time you did something wrong? I'll make sure to bring that up next time I read an article about something you did, regardless of what what you did wrong or what the article is about.

There doesn't have to be a conspiracy there - taking bets on well-connected rich people has a pretty high expected value.

What about things that arn't built on top of Kubernetes?

You're are not any more ignorant for avoiding political content on Facebook, it is a bunch of strawman echo chamber trash.