angusangus
TLDR: Health benefits of cycling are believed to significantly outweigh health risks on average.
It seems to me fairly self-evident that actions which chill debate or discussion limit political expression and an informed electorate, thereby fundamentally impinging on democracy. Why then distinguish between 'chilling effects' and an attack on democracy?
Extraordinary music does not require or benefit from commercial-scale budgets. It's always been made, and always will be, regardless of the economics.
As the previous commenter said, they did.
Wikileaks' stated journalistic method has always been to provide editorialized/pre-digested material along with complete unedited sources.
Money quote: "Oddo also said that workers were provided enough water, but the prisoners didn't sip it slowly enough."
Also for a sense of scope http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2008/07/what-do-prisoner... including this irrelevant but salacious detail: 'In 1997, a California prison put two men in solitary for telling journalists they were ordered to replace "Made in Honduras" labels on garments with "Made in the USA."'
EDIT: While there are obviously outlier cases where treatment is difficult, the majority of mental illness and homelessness is circumstantial and preventable.