anankaie
anankaie on Hacker News
That is not quite accurate -- the Game Pass library was a subset of what could be streamed -- things that were not available in Game Pass could still be streamed provided you owned them. When games went out of Game Pass you could purchase them and continue streaming.
Everyone ready for the new "date/time hates you" bugs?
Though not having to do the leap smear might be easier?
The cons example is conflating implementation details (return the value passed in to cons) with the semantics (return the left-side of this pair that was instantiated by cons). In the first case it is a category error to think about mutability. In the second mutability makes perfect sense.
Moreover, I suspect it is possible to construct an interface such that to prove statically that you can Liskov Substitute a type into it would be equivalent to deciding Halt: All you need are extensional semantics in your type system.
This is called CodeAct (
https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01030) and is available in a number of frameworks.
Patent was applied for 04.03.2026. langgraph-codeact _shipped_ this capability in February.
At this point it feels more difficult to ensure that your format cannot compute than to ensure it can
In their defense (both OP and HubSpot) the original is written to customers already aware of the context, and HackerNews asks submitters not to editorialize by default.
Moreover, the Library of Congress ruled that LLM outputs are not copyrightable, so technically, Anthropic has even less claim here.
Clair Obscur was perfectly playable for me through GeForce Now, for what it is worth, even when hitting parry timing. (N = 1, but a datum nonetheless)
The harness? I believe the company is planning to ease off in favor of Copilot. But we have our choice of models to use in Copilot, which feature Anthropic's as well.
I work at Microsoft. This is in the top tier of “things that did not happen”
Given that AI has successfully induced lawyers to use hallucinated cases, I would argue it is already convincing at it, to boot.
To be fair, to some extent that’s up to us. Time to get cleaning, I guess.
This article seems to miss Dawkins' point, which is not to assert that Claude is conscious -- he clearly states that he does not actually know. He seeks to wonder what brought about the evolution of consciousness in the first place.
They aren't wrong, but I suspect they are not going far enough in their prediction.
The future of AI will be dominated by Personal Computing, just like with normal application software, since AI, particularly voice and video and computer interaction, are at the IO layer and thus latency-sensitive for online tasks, and that is before privacy gets into the picture at all.
Much of the pharmaceutical industry depends on petroleum byproducts.
You do not need a Professional or Enterprise license to use the Visual Studio Build Tools:
> Previously, if the application you were developing was not OSS, installing VSBT was permitted only if you had a valid Visual Studio license (e.g., Visual Studio Community or higher).
From (https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cppblog/updates-to-visual-stu...). For OSS, you do not even need a Community License anymore.
Why not use winget to do it?
`winget install --id Microsoft.VisualStudio.2022.BuildTools`.
If you need the Windows(/App) SDK too for the WinRT-features, you can add `winget install --id Microsoft.WindowsSDK.10.0.18362` and/or `winget install --id Microsoft.WindowsAppRuntime.1.8`
> Google and Microsoft have already shut down several failed projects
Could you elaborate on this?
The framing is a bit off - every one of those URLs was created by the user having that conversation. They had to opt in to making it publicly visible.
What’s more curious is how Google got ahold of the URL list itself. Was the individual URLs indexed from somewhere else? Did a clever engineer notice a pattern and add some additional directives for the crawler? Did xAI put them in a sitemap they sent to Google? Something else?
I'm feeling a little maximalist about this: How about both?
I did not realize the outlet impacts the amperage… Is it a rating issue, or is there an actual part there that will trip?
And also journalists keep getting leaked as having internal journalist-only messaging lists, and often discuss the seemingly coordinated articles (or at least the events leading to them) in advent of publishing. See the JournoList (and related) scandals.
This is the most Software Engineer answer. Emphasizing only the distinctions that make no difference :D
Nobody seems to be suggesting it is any better when Google does it; but on Android (if you ignore the efforts that Google has gone to to make the experience be limited) one can at least avoid the AppStore altogether, while still installing and running various things on device.
Unless it is a design patent, though I have no idea if Japanese law even supports this kind of IP protection.
Note that this appears to be a pre-print? (Dated Jan 2025)
Yes, it is; governments do not have a magic right to never be questioned or even advocated against.