amonroe369
Problem is no filings happened until 2 years later and the accusers female best friend got a lawyer and they prepped filings.
I'm not saying Elon is innocent. The accusation, the timing, and the publication (Insider) are all sus. Its fishy to say the least.
Insider is a garbage publication.
A $250k settlement is questionable though with one of the world's richest men.
There were whistle blowers in 2018 who said Plaid did sell data and I am not sure anything came of it. Why collect more information than necessary in your screen scraping? Something is not adding up.
If say a company like Palantir or Dataminr are connecting in to monitor for some type of activity, Twitter could charge much more for that monitoring. Hedge funds could also monitor or access data on postings to see how a stock is fluctuating.
Twitter has a great concept and high end information based personalities on the platform, but its executed so poorly. Improve the interface, allow most free speech and you have a great population monitoring system that give you real time focus groups essentially.
Facebook/Meta went too big brother, collected way too much information. It was bad. I used to love facebook until 2014 it started turning with all the boomers joining, and the algo changes encouraging conflict.
I think Reddit will really be the next social media platform. It already has, but it uses semi-verified users, and anonymous users (less and less). Its been relatively transparent.
MX as a company, are the real good guys. There is no packaging of data for third party use that has ever occurred. In fact, I'm looking through due diligence packages from MX right now and I can confirm what I am saying.
Yodlee was caught. Plaid was caught. I do not yet know about Finicity.
Theres only two reasons Plaid would keep screen scraping. 1) They are still selling data to third parties or providing insights on data to third parties. 2) it is cheaper for Plaid to screen scrape than API.
Plaid tends to be better for Payments and early stage fintechs.
Yodlee for investments.
So if I am working for a top 10 bank, and I see value in a solution, if I cannot get it cheaper than it would cost me to develop it and time is not that big of a factor, I build it myself. If there are no time constraints and vendor can deliver solution at roughly the same cost I can build it for, I built it myself.
My guess as not being part of the stripe/plaid conversations or RFP. Zach's lawyers did not redline or challenge language around processes or IP with Stripe in RFP Agreements and that was likely the biggest downfall.
Plaid does have great litigation attorney's, I mean their class action settlement was only $58 million. So likely, Plaid might get something if there is IP that was protected. It will come out in discovery if a lawsuit gets legs.
PR is a hell of a marketing tactic.
"You may be a Class Member if you are a United States resident and you connected a financial account to an app between January 1, 2013 and November 19, 2021....
"This class action alleges Plaid took certain improper actions in connection with this process. The allegations include that Plaid: (1) obtained more financial data than was needed by a user's app"
If MX and Finicity are aggregators of aggregators, that would still mean Plaid would benefit, right? Maybe you (and your sales team) do not know your competition.
Publicly airing grievances as well against Stripe, who you could potentially partner with in the future, reflects an underlying toxic corporate culture at Plaid. I do not think Stripe will likely ever want to do business with you after this and prevent others from doing the same. I have never worked at Plaid, but I am not inclined to want to work with you based on what we are seeing here. Plaidsettlment.com