amon_raw
Re:Gödel's theorem debunks the most important AI myth – Roger Penrose ...
on Monday March 03, 2025 @01:59AM (#43239040)
>> What's more, whatever you like to call the transoforming of information into thinked information by definition can not be a (mathematical) function, because it would require all people to process the same information in the same way and this is plainly false
No this isn't the checkmate you think it is. It could still be a mathematical function. But every person transforming information into "thinked information" could have a different implementation of this function. Which would be expected as no person is made of the same code (DNA).
Re:The Password Game
on Tuesday June 27, 2023 @04:03PM (#36497941)
Well I is for Iodine,which has 53 as its atomic number, so this definitely wouldn't work anyways. XXXV is the way around this.