allThumbs
At a distance, though, reality can take on funny appearances.
EDIT: Wow, this is downvoted? Really?
1. Go to college:
a. spend many semesters in lectures
all of which tangentially brush
upon the final exam based on the
whims of the lecturer.
b. cram for final exam last minute
panic to crunch memory according
to advice on content which was
brushed upon during lectures.
2. Interview for job:
a. cram for interview by going to
coursera to crunch memory according
to interview memes based on the
whims of the interviewer.
b. spend the rest of term of employment
exercising skills which tend to be
tangentially brushed upon during
both interview and schooling while
the majority of actual tasks are often
googled and stack-overflowed
into place based on arbitrary design
decisions and politicized stack
choices.
3. Results:
a. good interviewees have learned
appropriate memes to reassure interviewers.
b. good students have learned obligatory cruft
to reassure professors.
c. actual necessities are tangential to
many or most entry barriers.
How accurate is this?Truthfully, lots of different scannable areas will unlock a phone. I've successfully and reliably configured my toes, the knuckles on my hands, and the tip of my nose. All of them work pretty good.
Unless observed using biometric security in a specific manner, an adversary might have a hard time deducing what kind of print will provide access.
Even if they've determined that the phone contains biometric scans tied to security, how would they know it's yours, and not someone else's, or even a specially printed 3D key ring fob or something?
Then again, criminals don't always think deeply about such details during a crime. They might just chop off both hands, grab the phone, and figure out the rest on the run.