alexro

How this proves that the money

1) has been moved 'illegally' (which authority is responsible)

2) linked to Putin's family personally

3) linked to the 'uncovered' scheme

This is what I call jumping between the facts

So, how this is considered to be corruption if money are moved to somewhere? Isn't it what every government is doing, including various US funds helping all kinds of crooks abroad?

Your source is jumping big between the facts too

Is anyone able to explain how they have jumped from this

"Andrei Kozlov was gunned down in 2006, weeks after trying to shutter the world’s biggest money-laundering scam"

to this

"—one reportedly used by Putin’s family and the FSB." ?

There are different kinds of elite: nationalists or globalists/cosmopolitans

Kurds aren't a nation, they're different tribes. Have different views, speak different languages/dialects

Through the whole history we don't know and will never know what's really happened/happening. Have you got an idea of how badly native population of America have been dealt with back then? DO you know what's happening in Kashmiri, Yemen, Africa, etc?

Is his question not valid?

If we follow this logic rigorously, how then to explain that Huawei is actually got some of the best smartphones and other products not found across the competitors?

Fundamentals are same as in social networks. But we don't know yet how to formalize them clearly.

== quality of life ==

by who's standards?

The rules are those that the US or "combined west" sets up.

Wait, but TypeScript makes inheritance a joy. So, how you do it - unless you don'r really reuse the implementation?

How can all the people passing before the camera to opt in?

Did she set up concentration camps or plans to?

China, Russia, Turkey, Saudis do horrible things with their own hands, whereas the West has found a cleaner way to employ a middle man for that.

Isn't it so difficult to grasp that you need a blockchain only and only if you want to avoid trusting someone in a (meaningful) transactional system? And you're ready to pay the price.

"38%" is still a minority, isn't it? Besides, this is counting miners, but what about businesses - almost none are interested.

"Economic majority" of bitcoin space have already agreed not to follow BU, that's why not many talk about it.

Crypto-currency runs not on faith but on greed, which is the same motivator banksters run on, but put under control.

>> is it just marketing hype?

It is now moving in the direction of becoming a politically only acceptable solution, when no one can impose any negative judgment making the solution provider look malicious even before anything bad happens.

So kind of a measure to eliminate potential risk

Print the walls and let this guy to do the rest https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_Uoq6JYKbw

If you like to risk buy Bitcoin instead. None of the Bitcoin buyers who held on the investment ever lost money.

Humans must unmerge with machines and make AI irrelevant

Somehow its becoming just that: 51/49 split everywhere

What'd you say if a chap you knew at school then turned up on the ISIS reports? This isn't a fantastic scenario isn't it?

Petition against these laws https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/173199

>> The key point here is "lincensed": totalitarian (or banana republics) and corrupt regimes have this convenient way of "licensing" to throw away anyone they don't like. <<

Isn't it something they learnt from the developed countries? Never mind patent trolls

US is not part of International Criminal Court either. So what's the point?

Are we back to the 90-ties with no code highlights in text?