aguacate
Stack: TypeScript, React, DeckGL, NodeJS, K8s (KOPS), Kafka, Elastic/Jaeger/OpenTracing, Redis, Terraform, Postgres, GDAL
We are expanding our team working on a geospatial platform that helps clients capture, visualise, organise and analyse their real-world assets. Capture is generally contracted to drone pilots but ultimate we are source agnostic. Upcoming challenges look a bit like game dev (multiplayer network programming, heavy UI interaction, 3D) & logistics/gig economy (distribution and orchestration of capture at a larger scale than we're accustomed to).
Dev team is low-key and welcoming team with a solid track record of delivery, small enough to feel fun, moving & growing enough to feel exciting.
Email me: [email protected]
I don't fully agree with the last paragraph. I mean I think if you're charitable you can alter the analogy a little bit to make it fit. I agree that there is no "vaccine" sub-unit, but let's say the equivalent is temporarily changing a data structure that is read by service A, not thinking about service B. Or not fully examining the flow on effects from service A etc.
That being said, if I'm a betting man, I suspect someone strictly avoiding vaccines through my original line of reasoning would end up like a prepper who never lives through doom's day.
I only have engineering analogies, but deploying bad software in a complex distributed system can appear fine until latent effects are discovered literally years later (e.g. all data in a specific column for a subset of users was overwritten for records within 6 months in 2008).
My understanding with some debilitating, fatal conditions are that the causes are not well known.
Fundamentally, it seems that most science is a result of abductive, deductive reasoning etc but ultimately, tinkering and observation i.e. if you don't analyse something over 10 years, you don't know its effect over 10 years.
By using a variety of different vaccines all over the world the expression of humanity is that we are spreading the risk among various vaccine types or contracting COVID itself.
So for a mostly self-interested individual in a rural area with a low chance of catching COVID, would it follow that the safest (but maybe selfish) bet is to wait many years?
Or is my premise or conclusion flawed, especially because I missing prerequisite knowledge?