agodfrey
Re:Exploring GPTs: ChatGPT in a trench coat?
on Wednesday November 15, 2023 @12:03PM (#38279089)
It isn’t a finetuned model.
Not sure what exactly it is, but it seems like just a bunch of prompt engineering.
Re:Reasons to Prefer Blake3 over Sha256
on Monday November 13, 2023 @10:49AM (#38251544)
Maybe you’re already aware, but you glossed over something: Since you’re using the hash to locate/identify the contect (you mentioned Merkle and git), if you support multiple hash functions you need some assurance that the chance of collisions is low across all supported hash functions. For example two identical functions that differ only in the value of their padding bytes (when the input size doesn’t match the block size) can’t coexist.
Re:"We'll call it AI to sell it, Machine Learning to Build it"
on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @10:35AM (#37844941)
While that’s true (on a plane, I’ve seen simply keeping the wings level labelled “Autopilot” without it even maintaining altitude), it’s still a travesty.
a) Pilots have certification and training which includes proper use of whatever ‘autopilot’ that plane has.
b) Even so, the name still “over-promises” in an arena where doing so risks lives. So it should never have been called that even on a plane. Let alone on a car sold to consumers with little regulation.