adricnet
In particular he works on/with the PoC||GTFO team and is responsible for the MD5 collision cover art in a past issue:
https://github.com/angea/pocorgtfo
For SHA-1 (and others) you might find more at his github project:
https://github.com/corkami/collisions
hth,
adric
https://github.com/Security-Onion-Solutions/security-onion/w...
It aligns quite well with the study (in diagrams and commented assembly) of x86 in POC || GTFO starting in pocorgtfo04.pdf chapter 3 provided by Shikhin Sethi.
https://www.nature.com/news/interactive-notebooks-sharing-th...
hth
adric
His educational advice was good but the attitude he shares via diction is unhelpful at best especially to folks who do not _yet_ have an awesome job in infosec.
Thanks, have a great weekend, cheers,
adric
It is interesting that he values "SANS" certifications, but not the courses for them.
Besides my own rambling[1] you might find these resources valuable instead:
* https://tisiphone.net/category/security-education/
* https://krebsonsecurity.com/category/how-to-break-into-secur...
* https://s3ctur.wordpress.com/2017/06/19/breaking-into-infose...
[1] http://dfirnotes.net/ etc.
hth,
adric
Here's G cache: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:dH0AFM8...
The OP, afaict: https://puri.sm/posts/primer-to-reverse-engineering-intel-fs...
Thanks for sharing!
My guess is because of potential friction with reproducible building (for Android) and this for iOS: https://github.com/WhisperSystems/Signal-iOS/issues/1063
hth, adric
More or less back on topic ... I bought a HP Probook for my on-the-road studies/work last cycle because I needed a portable that I could do _work_ with and repairability, matte screen, mouse buttons, VGA, HDMI, and whole lot of other things were much more important to me than width or mass or shiny. It came with Windows and it's well supported.
I would like to get another 17" macbook pro someday (mine is pretty old and 80% retired), and this move and the messaging around it suggests that Apple doesn't care to make one. It's no surprise, but it still stings a bit, and as noted else where it is breathtakingly clumsy for their remaining mac business (as is that press conference).
If that was your intent (to start a political argument), then so be it, but if instead of picking a fight you would like to understand the problem space better there are plenty of smart folks on HN and elsewhere who can provide use cases and data ... to say nothing of vendors who will argue from either side depending on what they are selling.
hth, adric
The historical maps are still around and might be FOIA'able from US gov or others. shiver The doctrine and culture around MAD is, even a few decades on, really quite frightening.
Did anyone make any headway porting/redoing the browser plugin to Mozilla? There were some mumblings about GSoC for that not that long ago.
A next read in this vein might be Bug Hunter's Diary by Tobias Klein: https://www.nostarch.com/bughunter
This is much more readable on Android/Chrome Moto G, will try more later.
Invisible Secrets [http://www.east-tec.com/invisiblesecrets/] has a mode for this that works quite well on HTML source. Rendering is unchanged and you have to be looking at the source and looking at the spacing to even see the difference manually.
Possibly because I have a FireFox extension just for those, actually: http://piro.sakura.ne.jp/xul/_popupalt.html.en
Anyway, thanks Randall and Mr Bill!
It's not that encrypting secrets is bad (and sessions are secrets). It's that encrypting everything without looking at what you gain and lose is poor engineering and it all seems to be politicized somehow (camps, factions, dogma..) with HTTPS-only being pushed as the answer to one security problem (confidentiality vs active eavesdroppers) at the expense of existing solutions to other problems, including integrity (please don't compromise my hosts), availability (I cannot use recent browsers to admin my equipment because they ban self-signed certs but trust 100+ CAs) and non-repudiation (where did the malware come from?).
... speaking as someone who studies malware analysis.
Cheers, adric
Automatic updates are easy (mostly). Healthy software and vulnerability management that doesn't damage productivity needlessly can be a lot of work. What do you test?
The classic simplified use case for this is Java runtimes: Your organization needs: a) A specific Java version to run a critical application b) Not to have workstations compromised though weak Java versions.
As a technology and security professional in this space your objective is to meet both of these goals. As the application developer you may have totally different goals (release date, market share, sales, renewals) and may not have these on your map at all...
https://www.propublica.org/nerds/item/doc-dollars-guides-col...
I hope they took more than a glance at what some other vendors are doing (EG Microsoft) before adding to what can already be a confusing collection of incompatible qualitative ratings :/
As noted by other commenters here a vague description of the category and some idea of the global risk, with a spot for you to add local risk seems a good tool here that serves both attack and defense with some balance. Oh, wait, we have that already in CVSS!
edit: spell acronyms right!
Although the author poses some interesting ideas the piece feels long and muddled and I'm not at all sure who the audience is or what the call to action might be. Voice is unclear as some paragraphs are personal statements ("I") and others are observations about culture and economics.
It might be more powerful if it was drastically shorter and simpler ... or maybe if it was three times longer with more references and a stronger set of recommendations. I really can't say.