activepeanut

http://www.ign.com/articles/2000/12/20/iraq-scores-hordes-of...

You have to be part of a very very narrow demographic to be compatible with this type of work environment.

Is this the latest, legal, technique to discriminate against older workers?

  If you need IM, use Jabber protocol.
  Log in with [email protected]

Also, you can only remove a submodule manually. There's no option to have git do it for you.

  Otherwise you can just use git submodules.

I wish I had something to suggest as a replacement. We're still trying to figure that one out ourselves. We just know we won't use submodules again. For now, we're manually managing disjoint repositories.

  ls -al | sort -nk5

  ls -larS

G+ solve this with circles, but I don't know anyone on G+, and it's too easy to make privacy mistakes on Facebook.

My Facebook profile is turning into my new Linkedin as I'm getting older.

http://reviewtimes.shinydevelopment.com/ios-annual-trend-gra...

void main() { while (1) printf("%c", "/\\"[rand()%2] ); }

  template<typename T>
  Array<T>::Array(int size)
  :  _size(size), 
     _data(new T(size)) // should have been new T[size]
  {}

  private:
     T* _data;
     int _size;
  };

_data depends on _size being initialized first. Therefore _size must be declared above _data.

Note: I understand the next example goes over this issue. I just think this example should've been declared properly as to avoid distracting the reader from the main problem, "() vs []".

  The team had elite and, for tech, senior talent from
  Twitter, Google, Facebook, Craigslist, Quora, and some
  of Chicago's own software companies such as Orbitz and
  Threadless

Ditto for certain groups at Google (cough android cough).

Either have a dedicated research group, or give people a pass at being 20% less productive at their regular job.

Here's a novel idea.. increase your workforce by 20%? I know, that's just crazy talk. :)

I'm not a fan of RIM, but the iPhone might just be today's Ford Model T.

  Never attribute to malice that which
  is adequately explained by stupidity.

http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AGRPN

Brutal.