acgh213
someone even patched out the checks and got it running and was still caught and banned permanently [1]
it's a shame too because it ran on stadia for years before Google killed it and that ran Linux as it's main system. so there's clearly the ability. just a desire to prevent it at all levels
But. This just solved all those issues. Threw my nextdns address into tailscale and away i go. I swear every single time I run into some modern inconvenience of the web Tailscale (by mission statement) is there to solve it.
Its the "reality has a left leaning bias" and its being met with the same attempts to indoctrinate people towards hate. The only group of people who would feel quote 'persecuted' unquote are those who hold hateful and bigoted views.
I don't think theres anything majorly wrong with redditlikes/twitterlikes/federated mastadon sites. But the moment I see a random site telling me to use alternatives that only promote hateful views, I don't see it as valid. Regardless of the data used, sites like Gab shouldn't be given a spotlight since they refuse to even federate with other Mastadon servers.
I don't even want to get into how Gab is clearly a cesspool [1], the next two sites listed are 4chan twitter analogues, and the overite page is the terfs who were banned from reddit.
In this day and age, a reddit clone isn't the same as a digg clone. A reddit clone is mostly a "refuge" (rdrama being a great example counter to my terf/bigot point) for those who are banned from reddit. In reddits history, the only subreddits who get outright banned are those like /r/cringetopia /r/fatpeoplehate /r/thedonald
Communities that promote hate. And seeing such a clearly bad list on hacker news, I had to speak up.
[1]https://www.npr.org/2018/10/28/661532688/a-look-at-gab-the-f...
I think the title should be changed to reflect that.
@dang any input?
Seems really odd, and like a possible PR fluff piece paid by IBM and Weather.com to try and convince people that the built-in weather app for iOS 15 will be somehow bad. When in fact it will have the same features as Weather.com+ for free.
Just feels wrong, and I can't entirely explain why.
Edit: Leaving the rest of this for posterity, on a second read through it seems that Apple is using weather.com as the weather app on iPados 15, which is just a confusing decision on their part.
Now I can't confirm this, I'm not on his account, and he hasn't posted it yet. But I would put a nickel on the other 5 bucks being paid directly to Uber. Which again, not uncommon.
Here's an example from a delivery I did the other day, I can get more screenshots if you want. But out of the 22 dollars the customer paid for the delivery, I received 5.61 before tip. The rest went to uber [1]
There are a lot of games coming out, but I really don't think Flight VR games are it's major selling point right now. Just as Fight Sims haven't been the top sellers for anything expect their own equipment. If you want it added for Microsoft Fight Simulator, check the forums and I'm sure theres post you could boost with your opinion.
But I really never see X-Plane integrating DLSS into their product. They have to focus on realism in all aspects, and are more focused on appeasing the FAA for their flight sim accreditation then benefiting users.
This dislike of X-Plane started after the Spyware incident, even if they have doubled back, I really doubt X-Plane will be advancing anything this generation.
To circle back to your initial statement: >DLSS is so irritatingly restricted right now
Its just not true.
Its a new technology out for less than a year at this point. It takes more than 2 months to incorporate a completely new graphics stack unless you're already using an engine like Unreal 4. The comment just feels bloated with pretentiousness, and isn't fitting of this forum. I don't use DLSS because I don't really see the benefit without heavy raytracing, and I can't imagine what it for do for me in a game where I am flying 40k feet off the ground.
Overall, email is killer, I would love to move everything toward emails that I can filter, or as the OP posted, a Unified inbox.
I wonder if there is a patent on it.
Glad he made the sane option, I held off from converting my eBook library to the system because of the previous python2 ignorance.
Edit: This expands past these two bands, I'm giving two small examples in a large field that I listen to. I think artists are leaning toward either singles that get tons of airplay or albums that get listen time drawn out because the album is cohesive. Its two different styles of listening,and both are being catered. You can have a one off single that one group of people love, and another group that can't listen to that single outside of the album. Streaming services have done a good job at allowing this to happen.
This article highlights the behind the scenes but people wouldn't pay for it as highlighted in the article.
Personally, I would.
And if you want something OSS, https://f-droid.org/en/packages/net.typeblog.shelter/ which does the same thing.
As for "I'd rather have the option to trust a handful of users which have all report that I'm dead before taking any actions" is a fair point regarding that Facebook requires a death certificate. Though, this is not the same as the Inactivity manager, which is what Google is offering. The purpose is to be a way to allow people to access content on your accounts after a period of time. It allows a set number of contacts to access your account in a provisioned way, through a very refined selection set that even breaks down separate google play stores (books, music, play, and movies.) I also saw selections for Mail, Photos, and 42 other different data points that can be sent to separate users.
It is a preemptive step by the account owner to verify their information will be easily retrieved by a family member or friend.
I would suggest taking a look at the Inactivity manager. It has a more robust set of features than most inactivity systems, and doesn't just apply to death. Even in death, it allows a family to collect photos, contact lists, and other mementos of a persons life.
This article is informative, but it is nothing new.
Excessive ads on a site that serves click bait isn't a site worth a 100% hit against your PC, unless it allows you the profit, the entire amount or a portion depending how you are mining the coins using Moreno.
New York Times wants to charge for subscription over 5 articles a month, they put forth the effort to earn it. While not abusing my trust. They aren't forcing a user into a choice that is similar to a loss/loss situation like Salon.
I pay for electricity, I pay for internet. I pay for hardware. I don't pay directly to visit a site online. I pay a fee to access the content if it is locked down. But if someone wants to places ads, that doesn't take a hit on a system. Then the content is worth it.
If Salon wants to offer a choice of blocking those who AdBlock, or mine a currency for them. The site isn't worth any bit of it's content. I'll waste my processing power and actual power bill on something that benefits my own life and not the Salon Media Group.