abvaw

Contracts signed by mentally incompetent people are generally invalid. So this article isn't about that. Therefore, when the article says the courts accept the contracts as valid they can't be talking about the contracts signed by the infirm, but the article conflates both things maliciously.

If you haven't understood (or even read) what they are telling you to sign you shouldn't sign. What you can't do is sign and then complain about what you signed. That's ridiculous, and the courts agree.

Imagine coming in 2023 to an American site and telling people to have any sort of moral standards, like not having extra-marital sex. What a sucker.

Majoritarianism is still preferable to the minoritarianism that some countries have to suffer.

Whaaa? How much time? Does this also apply to SD cards and such?

There are other countries that do all of that and more and we accept them openly. Isn't that hypocrisy?

You are getting downvoted because it's actually Newman who says it.

What does human psychology say about people who feel superior to the plebs who post online on whether they like iOS or Android?