News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

ZeSmith

Re:Stay away from This* (thiswebhost.com) on Tuesday August 16, 2011 @10:34AM (#2891303)
What's that even doing here?
Re:I Like PHP on Wednesday August 10, 2011 @02:54PM (#2869654)
For ASP.NET, indeed, WebForms can be a bit violent since it's essentially an abstraction that tries, with mixed sucess, to make you forget you're writing for the Web.

ASP.NET MVC, which came out 2 years ago, is much closer to RoR and other similar frameworks, and is a better abstraction in my opinion.

Re:Poll: Do you use Opera (the browser)? on Thursday July 28, 2011 @09:50AM (#2816757)
Ironically, "never or rarely" seems to be the most popular choice.
Re:Patent troll Lodsys now after apps with 'More Apps' links on Wednesday July 13, 2011 @12:44PM (#2759562)
They're using their patents to crush their competitors. It's not patent trolling, it's anti-competitive behavior.
I wonder if it would be possible to claim that patents used in this way actually violate antitrust laws.
Yeah, "defender's advantage" does not apply in the wacky world of computer security.
Re:Noir - The Clojure web framework on Wednesday June 22, 2011 @11:26AM (#2683512)
I'm surprised that there's no large "Fork me on Github!" link at the top right corner of the screen.

Still, looks very interesting.

Re:LulzSec: Why we do what we do on Friday June 17, 2011 @01:00PM (#2666225)
Still does not make it okay.
Re:Apple files motion to intervene in Lodsys case on Friday June 10, 2011 @10:47AM (#2641023)
It actually makes sense for them to defend the developers: after all, would you work in an ecosystem where you can get sued at any time without being protected by said ecosystem's owner?
It's in fact entertaining enough to appeal to non-StarCraft 2 players.
Re:Mysterious number 6174 on Monday June 06, 2011 @03:40PM (#2626187)
Which domain? Reals? That's a lot of numbers. Infinity, in fact.
Considering how violent is the repression there, going on the streets would just make the protesters even easier targets.

Things are not looking good...

Re:BareMetal is a 64-bit OS for x86-64 based computers on Friday May 27, 2011 @11:07AM (#2591696)
I see plenty of people who claim they write "C++" but end up writing some mutant "C with classes" C++ is not just "C with addons", it's a different language that happen to share its syntax and part of its standard library. Lumping them together leads to ugly C++ code.
Re:BareMetal is a 64-bit OS for x86-64 based computers on Thursday May 26, 2011 @02:46PM (#2588954)
The thing that strikes me the most is how the author seems to consider C and C++ to be a single language called "C/C++".
Re:EFF: Apple Should Stand Up and Defend Its Developers on Friday May 20, 2011 @03:51PM (#2569179)
Your definition of "fun" does not match mine.
Patent trolling is a highly effective business model, but it has to make no sense in order to work.
Re:Bye Bye Skype, Top 3 Free Replacements on Monday May 16, 2011 @09:14AM (#2552410)
A PR boost for them, at least. Can't tell if it would be a good thing in the end, though.
That's what you call a "meta sic".
Re:Google Chrome Hacked? on Monday May 09, 2011 @03:04PM (#2529799)
Considering the business they're in, I'm not sure lying about that would be a good idea.
Re:Nokia announces start of Qt 5 development on Monday May 09, 2011 @10:40AM (#2528839)
Qt has been a huge platform for some time now. It's what I call the Boost syndrome: if you want to use a small part of Qt, you have to shove your whole arm in the machine.
Re:Four Canadian university students elected to Parliament on Wednesday May 04, 2011 @10:43AM (#2513961)
I'd say people vote more for the party's leader. But yeah, they don't care about the MP.
Re:Data Structure Visualization on Monday May 02, 2011 @10:07AM (#2506304)
Lots of typos in there.
Re:OOP practiced backwards is "POO" on Friday December 10, 2010 @04:42PM (#1993287)
Fun thing is that "object oriented programming", in French, is "programmation orientée par objets", which is usually shortened to "POO" (pronounced Pay-Oh-Oh).