Xorathena
And often that's a false dichotomy.
This website collects many such examples, where more performance was linked to more sales/etc: https://wpostats.com
https://docs.python.org/3/extending/extending.html
https://nodejs.org/dist/latest-v20.x/docs/api/n-api.html#nod...
https://docs.python.org/3/library/ctypes.html
When using Zig functions and structs on the low side there are some nice opportunities for making the low/high interface more automatic at comptime, especially when you're jointly compiling (your Zig code + a Zig-based Python interpreter + your Python code) together into one WASM blob.
Disclaimer/public-commitment-to-getting-it-released: I've written most of a Python interpreter in Zig as part of another project. (just the basics — won't be big and professional like CPython.) I'll reply here eventually when it's done, available as FLOSS, and ready to say "high-low".
Is it E2EE directly between you and the other person?
The website doesn't say much before you click the Start button. Everything has tradeoffs, and implementation details matter.
> I invite them to attempt writing a few million words. It will give one a very considered view on one’s own style.
That it will! I recently went from [not writing many documents] to [writing a ton of documents], and it turbocharged my reflecting-on-style background process.
Thanks again for your documents over the decades!
...and as a quote in HPMOR put it:
> Apparently people who were in books actually sounded like a book when they talked.