Volscio
Cloudburst is a seed-funded New York-based remote-first company helping customers with detection, prevention, and investigation into cryptocurrency market manipulation and fraud.
Senior+ Backend Software Engineer: https://www.indeed.com/job/senior-backend-software-engineer-...
Data Collection Engineer: https://www.indeed.com/job/data-collection-engineer-b930cd79...
Flashpoint provides meaningful intelligence that enables large enterprises and the public sector to bolster cybersecurity, confront fraud, combat insider threats, enhance physical security, and address vendor risk and supply chain integrity. Flashpoint accomplishes this through integration of collections systems and a streaming data pipeline with an intelligence analysis team.
Flashpoint Engineering hires for empathetic and force multiplying individuals, and assesses candidates through a take-home test, code review, and structured interviews.
Software Engineer #1 job description: https://boards.greenhouse.io/flashpoint/jobs/4077118002?gh_j...
Software Engineer #2 job description: https://boards.greenhouse.io/flashpoint/jobs/4212896002?gh_j...
The article lumps it all together; "hey, we should do a transit article today".
https://medium.com/@mrdavenport/swarm-branding-and-visual-de...
Cached: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:2Z0Puiw...
Have been tinkering with something similar: https://galapag.us/ I don't have all that much time to work on it but I think by next year I'm going to go back to spending time working on it instead of general compsci/coding nightly training.
Among those types, what Snowden did was considered, at BEST, a warranted discussion but highly unprofessional and a breach of trust. (whether you agree with that or not, but that represents their core interests in serving the federal government)
"United Capital Partners, a private company registered in Moscow that owns 48 percent of Vkontakte, disputed Durov's statements on Tuesday, saying he had been seeking to “politicize the situation” because there were “serious legal claims” against him and he was suspected of embezzlement."
http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/vkontakte-founder...
But cable TV has continued on strong. If anything I feel like, despite cable-cutters, the vast majority of people out there still regularly consume cable TV in one form or another. Perhaps what's changed is that the "golden age of TV content" right now feels more like the movie industry, in that big cable networks release big TV series and market them heavily almost as if you were going to the theater to watch a blockbuster movie.
The online streaming services actually seem diluted now, while cable networks have very strong brands; I don't really have netflix but my wife and I have ondemand and a dvr through time warner and 3 different devices to watch amazon through. The fobs you can get from google and amazon and whomever else will continue to dilute that access to streaming (which is good for competition and for DIYers at some point, I suppose)
But really the battle is about whether cable TV will continue to be an always-on service, and in that regard I think it will. Just flip on your TV, which you may have in several rooms in your house, or at your favorite sports bars, or in the office lobby, or wherever. It can be background, it can be a social experience for live sporting events (probably the most compelling reason for keeping cable), etc.
The other component is that video games are now more compelling to play/watch, and in fact a lot of youtube and twitch channels are now regularly consumed by viewers.
I would argue that the "disruption" already happened a long time ago but the cable networks and service providers have adjusted and assimilated to various degrees, such that we now have tons of avenues for stuff to watch.
Maybe this just takes some perspective to see because I feel like people keep predicting cable TV will just die or something, and that seems like such a naive way of looking at the world.
In Stranger Visions artist Heather Dewey-Hagborg creates portrait sculptures from analyses of genetic material collected in public places. Working with the traces strangers unwittingly leave behind, Dewey-Hagborg calls attention to the impulse toward genetic determinism and the potential for a culture of genetic surveillance.
Then that code and how it was created circulates to other orgs (hopefully through open source), then it's picked up by researchers and grad students who start to apply it to more important research. Maybe also privately funded or state-sponsored aid types read about how it was done and they apply those principles to the high-minded projects that you want to see.
Blaming society for having "fucked up" priorities is a very college freshman view of the world. There is no way that even the most talented engineers would also have the wherewithal, experience, connections, and local knowledge to produce sustainable projects that would, I don't know what you were imagining, lower poverty or increase literacy rates.
Also context is important for whatever one says, and a statement hanging on its own is rarely very convincing. It can be a red flag (whistleblowing) and it can be inspiring (famous quotations) but usually an argument is stronger as a result of the context from which it came (a culture, a person's stature, reputation, etc.).
That all said, I think we need to have anonymity, pseudonymity, and also verified identity. If we choose to share across those boundaries (sharing Facebook details with another service, as an example) then we have to deal with and accept the drawbacks. We can't expect to have isolated identities exactly the way we want them given that that kind of system would be a quagmire for developers to build...
These types of financial articles are the worst because they are unable to accurately predict the future of new markets. They're the types of articles that you read a decade later and kind of pat on their head.
Skepticism of an industry is one thing, but most of the time that skepticism is not coming from any type of informed or even historically accurate perspective. It's just not understanding what the current market price of things is. Which is pretty dangerous for a newspaper article writer.