TuGuQuKu

Please follow this rule when reading my posts:

"Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize."

You've disappointed me with your disingenuous misinterpretation of my comment and I strongly suggest you no longer reply to my posts.

I'd love to see some proof that any of the wild claims made are remotely factual.

  I don't want to donate to charity (I have my own reasons for that, don't ask)

Although they managed to do a pretty plausible portrayal of your average bitcoin libertarian lol

Capitalism is the most efficient economic system.

The article, your comment and the argument they make, that this effect -- if it exists -- should be highly visible across all strata of society, are taking a ton of assumptions for granted. There are a number of plausible scenarios in which this argument falls apart completely:

a) The act of ruling over criminal proceedings places one in a very unique position of power over complete strangers' lives which only judges routinely experience. What subtle effects on empathy, vindictiveness, leniency do minor fluctuations in mood have that are exacerbated by the unique conditions of this profession?

b) Judges are members of an extremely privileged professional class and universally come from extremely privileged backgrounds. The mechanism of the hedonic treadmill might explain how working class folks cope with regular day-to-day stresses with almost no impact to their mood where being peckish at midday is likely the harshest reality of life that a financially secure judge making $100 an hour has to deal with and may disproportionately sour their temper to a comparable degree that someone making minimum wage worries about paying their rent.

Etc etc. There is no compelling proof of this argument.

Fuck the "bipartisan plan". M4A now.

Imagine if we lived in a society where these stories were about housing startups, not hotel startups. Food production startups instead of food packaging startups. Public infrastructure projects instead of scooter renting apps. Actual creation of wealth and value added to the economy instead of endless insipid rent-seeking, shuffling value around from middleman to middleman until one of them figures out a more efficient way to extract.

Cult has only recently (etymologically speaking) become a pejorative in English

1. You generally require a charismatic, authoritarian leader who has strong central command over the group and whose word is law; tenets that actively lead the congregation to act against their best interests; and a dogmatic belief system with strict limits on interpretation of religious teachings (really just the first point again).

2. The classical definition of "cult" has almost no overlap with today's perjorative evolution of the word and just means a system of worship.

Who hasn't???

I donate much more than 1.2% of my net worth to charity, and every 2 weeks to boot. Somehow I also manage to do it without publicizing it on dozens of media outlets every time or blowing tens of millions on a disgustingly wasteful luxury lifestyle. But where's my army of loser internet sycophants?

So brave of him to donate 1.2% of his vast fortune to a PR project with his name on it! This really makes up for the whole FOXCONN-level human despair harvesting labor practices thing imo. Hell, we don't even need to go through with that legislation any more.

Living standards, calorie consumption, GDP, literacy and life expectancy skyrocketed higher and faster for more people anywhere in history under the early years of the USSR and PRC but we tend to only talk about those metrics when they're convenient.

>Apparently we are to hold every rich person to some esoteric standard because every wealthy person made their money by exploiting others; none of them were positive-sum contributors to society.

Yes, that's correct. What, you think Bezos and Ma are genius visionaries for coming up with the idea of buying things on the internet? A democratically managed worker's co-op could have accomplished the same things as Amazon and Alibaba with almost none of the disgusting exploitative labor practices and wide scale human suffering.

Uh, yes?

I give a higher percentage of my income to charitable causes than any of these "philanthropists" and I manage to not waste an insane amount of money on a disgustingly wasteful life of luxury at the same time, but for some reason I don't have an army of sycophants defending my every action on the internet.

Doubtful; I make more money than you, and I only make high liquidity investments, so I came away looking pretty nice the last time (too young to have made any money from 2008 though)

Never read my posts again lol

Sounds miserable -- maybe just get a job you enjoy instead of eating lentils every day so that you can squirrel away an extra $3 into a retirement account?

Either way, enjoy watching your plan to get rich doing nothing crash and burn when this bubble pops in 2 years lol

Wow, they made a deliberate effort to design glyphs that all look exactly the same. Every single letter written in cursive would be indistinguishable from 5-6 others.

It is maddening that there is even still a "discussion" happening. Tabs for indentation, spaces for alignment. Didn't even get mentioned in the article. All the pros, zero cons. Enough of this. Enough, enough.

"Use tabs for indentation, spaces for alignment: the superior approach. Code is indented and aligned properly, and indentation is flexible. Use spaces for both indentation and alignment: still fine, but not flexible enough. Use tabs for both indentation and alignment: completely unacceptable, leads to headaches."

Since this also happens every time, if you're currently writing a harebrained reply about "mixing tabs and spaces!!!!", you don't understand what's being discussed and should permanently recuse yourself from the conversation.

The parent comment just left out the 大 (big/great) from the sentence example

好き - like

大好き - love (lit. "great fondness")